Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

326
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
326
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

365
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
365
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

176
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
176

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanisms of Progression and Challenges for Intervention in the Natural History of Early Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Testing the reliability of AI-generated protein structures.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Robotic management of complex ileal conduit complications.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Balancing Processability and Performance: Benzoxazole Thermosets with Ultra-Low Dielectric Constants and High Thermal Stability.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Environmental reservoirs of carbapenem-resistant organisms in the intensive care unit: a multicenter longitudinal study in two middle-income country hospitals.

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control·2026
Same author

Integrating Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in the Therapeutic Protocol of Extensive Pediatric Burns: Current Practice and Further Treatment Decision Algorithm.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same journal

mGem: Subcellular compartments in bacterial pathogens and their role during infection.

mBio·2026
Same journal

mGem: A perfect storm in the era of global warming-the convergence between thermotolerant fungi and altered immunity.

mBio·2026
Same journal

Global genomic surveillance of <i>Salmonella</i> in the environment: assessing virulence and antimicrobial resistance at scale.

mBio·2026
Same journal

Detoxifying and depolymerizing microorganisms reveal intertwined guild collaborations in the gut microbiome of the generalist macro-algivorous fish <i>Kyphosus cinerascens</i>.

mBio·2026
Same journal

Importance of manganese uptake in uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> CFT073 during urinary tract infection.

mBio·2026
Same journal

Erratum for Theriault et al., "Utilization of a CRISPRi-based <i>ex vivo</i> challenge model to reveal temporally dependent gene essentiality in intracellular <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>".

mBio·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.2K

Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings.

Abraham Gihawi1, Yuchen Ge2,3, Jennifer Lu2,3

  • 1Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia , Norwich, United Kingdom.

Mbio
|October 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Recent cancer microbiome studies may be invalid. Re-analysis reveals most reported cancer-associated microbes were absent, suggesting original findings and follow-up research are likely flawed.

Keywords:
bioinformaticscancercomputational biologymetagenomicsmicrobiome

More Related Videos

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

12.9K
A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

632

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

28.2K
Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

12.9K
A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease
09:52

A Clinical Metaproteomics Workflow Implemented within Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform to Analyze Host-Microbiome Interactions Underlying Human Disease

Published on: January 10, 2025

632

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Oncology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Recent studies suggest a distinct human cancer microbiome.
  • Numerous papers have reported microbial signatures for various cancer types.
  • Concerns exist regarding the data quality and validity of these initial findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-analyze data from studies reporting cancer-associated microbial signatures.
  • To assess the validity of the original cancer microbiome findings.
  • To determine the presence and significance of microbes in human cancers.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of existing datasets from cancer microbiome studies.
  • Statistical and bioinformatic evaluation of microbial presence in cancer samples.
  • Comparison of original findings with re-analyzed data.

Main Results:

  • The re-analysis indicated that most microbes reported in original studies were not present in the samples.
  • Significant discrepancies were found between initial reports and re-analyzed data.
  • The presence of a distinct cancer microbiome, as originally reported, is questionable.

Conclusions:

  • The original report on the cancer microbiome and subsequent studies are likely invalid due to data flaws.
  • Re-analysis challenges the existence of specific microbial signatures in human cancers as previously claimed.
  • Further rigorous investigation is needed to confirm or refute the role of the microbiome in cancer.