Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
E/e' Ratio and Diastolic Function Between Deep Vein Catheterization and Internal Fistula Treatment in Patients with
Insights
Internal fistula and deep vein catheterization improve uremic patients' diastolic function. Internal fistula offers superior reduction in left ventricular dimensions, though neither significantly impacts the E/e
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) often leads to cardiovascular complications, including diastolic dysfunction.
- Dialysis access methods, such as internal fistula and deep vein catheterization, may influence cardiac function in uremic patients.
- The E/e' ratio is a key indicator of diastolic function, reflecting the early diastolic mitral inflow to early diastolic mitral annular velocity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between diastolic function and the E/e' ratio in patients with chronic renal disease undergoing different vascular access procedures.
- To compare the effects of internal fistula versus deep vein catheterization on diastolic function and cardiac dimensions in uremic patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 50 uremia patients.
- Patients were divided into two groups based on vascular access: internal fistula (n=42) and deep vein catheterization (n=8).
- Echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular dimensions and diastolic function indices (E/e'), were assessed before and after treatment.
Main Results:
- Both internal fistula and deep vein catheterization significantly reduced left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVd), E peak, A peak, E/A value, and ventricular volumes/areas post-treatment.
- Internal fistula group showed significantly greater reductions in LVd, left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVs), and ventricular volumes/areas compared to the deep vein catheterization group.
- Neither treatment modality demonstrated a significant improvement in the E/e' ratio.
Conclusions:
- Both internal fistula and deep vein catheterization can ameliorate diastolic function and reduce pulmonary pressure in uremic patients.
- Internal fistula appears more effective than deep vein catheterization in reducing left ventricular dimensions.
- The impact of both access methods on improving the E/e' ratio in uremic patients is not significant.
Objective:
To examine the relationship between diastolic function and the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e') in patients with chronic renal disease who had deep vein catheterization and internal fistula.
Methods:
The clinical data of 50 uremia patients treated at The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. To assess the differences in E/e' ratio and patients' diastolic function between the two groups, they were split into two teams according to the various therapy modalities: the internal fistula team (n = 42) and the deep vein catheterization team (n = 8).
Results:
After treatment, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVd), E peak, a peak and E/A value, the volume and area of four chambers of the left ventricle (LV), the volume and area of two chambers of LV in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < .001). After treatment, the LVd left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVs), the four-chamber volume of LV, and the two-chamber volume and area of LV in patients with internal fistula were significantly lower than those in patients with deep vein catheterization (P < .001). After treatment, E peak, A peak and E/A value, e' interventricular septum, E/e' value of interventricular septum, e' lateral wall, and E of lateral wall in patients with internal fistula group.
Conclusion:
Both deep vein catheterization and internal fistula treatment can improve the diastolic function and reduce the pulmonary pressure of uremic patients to a certain extent, but internal fistula treatment is better than deep vein catheterization in reducing LVd, LVs, LV four-chamber volume, LV two-chamber volume and area, and the effects of both in improving the E/e ratio of patients are not obvious.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

