Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

A Uniform Shear Assay for Human Platelet and Cell Surface Receptors via Cone-plate Viscometry
Published on: June 5, 2019
Can Pseudothrombocytopenia be recognised at first look?
Seda Yilmaz1, Mikail Dağ2, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoğlu3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic of Hematology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Our aim was to determine the laboratory parameters that distinguish pseudothrombocytopenia from true thrombocytopenia. A total of 107 patients who were referred to the adult hematology outpatient clinic with thrombocytopenia and subsequently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia, immune thrombocytopenia and pseudothrombocytopenia were included in our study. Hemogram parameters on admission, platelet value in the control hemogram and peripheral smear findings were recorded. Forty three (40.2%) males and 64 (59.8%) females, were included in our study. There were 25 patients in the leukaemia group, 39 in the immune thrombocytopenia group and 43 in the pseudothrombocytopenia group. Control platelet value and red cell distribution width/platelet ratio were found to be statistically significantly different between the 3 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis based on platelet values showed that platelet value ≤ 38,000/µL (86% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001), difference between 2 consecutively measured platelet levels ≤ 11. 000/µL (79.1% sensitivity, 79.7% specificity, P < .001), red cell distribution width/platelet ratio ≥ 0.413 (90.7% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001) were found to be in favor of true thrombocytopenia. In the differentiation of pseudothrombocytopenia and true thrombocytopenia, the difference between the hemogram parameters at the time of admission and the platelet count in the control blood count may be guiding. This result may reduce patient and physician anxiety and prevent patient referral.
Our aim was to determine the laboratory parameters that distinguish pseudothrombocytopenia from true thrombocytopenia. A total of 107 patients who were referred to the adult hematology outpatient clinic with thrombocytopenia and subsequently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia, immune thrombocytopenia and pseudothrombocytopenia were included in our study. Hemogram parameters on admission, platelet value in the control hemogram and peripheral smear findings were recorded. Forty three (40.2%) males and 64 (59.8%) females, were included in our study. There were 25 patients in the leukaemia group, 39 in the immune thrombocytopenia group and 43 in the pseudothrombocytopenia group. Control platelet value and red cell distribution width/platelet ratio were found to be statistically significantly different between the 3 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis based on platelet values showed that platelet value ≤ 38,000/µL (86% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001), difference between 2 consecutively measured platelet levels ≤ 11. 000/µL (79.1% sensitivity, 79.7% specificity, P < .001), red cell distribution width/platelet ratio ≥ 0.413 (90.7% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001) were found to be in favor of true thrombocytopenia. In the differentiation of pseudothrombocytopenia and true thrombocytopenia, the difference between the hemogram parameters at the time of admission and the platelet count in the control blood count may be guiding. This result may reduce patient and physician anxiety and prevent patient referral.
Related Concept Videos
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...

