Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
Published on: September 20, 2024
Non-invasive imaging of neural activity with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT): a modelling
Kai Mason1, Kirill Aristovich1, David Holder1
1Dept. of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower St, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Objectives.(1) Develop a computational pipeline for three-dimensional fast neural magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT), (2) determine whether constant current or constant voltage is preferable for MDEIT, (3) perform reconstructions of simulated neural activity in a human head model with realistic noise and compare MDEIT to EIT and (4) perform a two-dimensional study in a saline tank for MDEIT with optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) and compare reconstruction algorithms.Approach.Forward modelling and image reconstruction were performed with a realistic model of a human head in three dimensions and at three noise levels for four perturbations representing neural activity. Images were compared using the error in the position and size of the reconstructed perturbations. Two-dimensional MDEIT was performed in a saline tank with a resistive perturbation and one OPM. Six reconstruction algorithms were compared using the error in the position and size of the reconstructed perturbations.Main results.A computational pipeline was developed in COMSOL Multiphysics, reducing the Jacobian calculation time from months to days. MDEIT reconstructed images with a lower reconstruction error than EIT with a mean difference of 7.0%, 5.5% and 11% for three noise cases representing current noise, reduced current source noise and reduced current source and magnetometer noise. A rank analysis concluded that the MDEIT Jacobian was less rank-deficient than the EIT Jacobian. Reconstructions of a phantom in a saline tank had a best reconstruction error of 13%, achieved using 0th-order Tikhonov regularisation with simulated noise-based correction.Significance.This study demonstrated that three-dimensional MDEIT for neural imaging is feasible and that MDEIT reconstructed superior images to EIT, which can be explained by the lesser rank deficiency of the MDEIT Jacobian. Reconstructions of a perturbation in a saline tank demonstrated a proof of principle for two-dimensional MDEIT with OPMs and identified the best reconstruction algorithm.
More Related Videos
07:42Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published on: August 17, 2018
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...