Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

State gun policies affect veteran and civilian suicide rates differently.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026
Same author

From Intervals to Probabilities: Bayesian Inference as the Framework Surgical Quality Benchmarking Requires.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

The Gut-Brain Axis: A Case Report of Transanal Extrusion of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Literature Review.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Traumatic Intrapericardial Diaphragmatic Hernia: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Multimodal Evaluation.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Web Scraping Techniques for Surgical Research: A Technical Tutorial With a Worked Example in Publication Data Mining.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Cloud Computing Startup for Data Science- A Tutorial.

The American surgeon·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

328

Interpretable machine learning accurately reclassifies lobectomy surgical approaches by cost.

Michael P Rogers1, Haroon Janjua1, Meagan Read1

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.

Surgery
|October 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning can identify patients who may benefit from less expensive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) instead of robotic lung resection. This approach helps reduce healthcare costs by personalizing treatment based on individual patient factors.

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
07:30

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

328
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
07:30

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory

Published on: March 18, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Health Economics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Robotic lung resection volume is increasing despite higher costs and unproven superiority over video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
  • Identifying cost drivers and optimizing surgical approaches is crucial for healthcare efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate machine learning's ability to identify factors influencing costs in lung resection.
  • To determine if high-cost robotic approaches can be reclassified into lower-cost alternatives using predictive modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Florida and CMS datasets for open, VATS, and robotic lobectomy cases.
  • K-means clustering to identify robotic cost groups.
  • Development of predictive models using artificial neural networks, SVM, CART, and GBM algorithms.

Main Results:

  • Identified 4 distinct cost clusters among 6,618 cases.
  • Machine learning models reclassified 35% of robotic cases to potentially lower or higher cost categories if VATS was used.
  • Key cost predictors included clinic admission, metastatic cancer diagnosis, urgent admission, and dementia.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning and clustering can identify patient groups suitable for VATS or robotic lobectomy with similar costs.
  • Individual patient factors influencing cost can be identified using explainable AI.
  • This modeling can stratify high-cost patients to lower-cost approaches, aiding expenditure reduction.