Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small
Elisabeth Calek1, Julia Binder2, Pilar Palmrich2
1Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Insights
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) significantly impacts infant fat-free mass (FFM) and growth velocity. Early nutritional intervention is crucial for IUGR infants to prevent impaired development and FFM loss.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is linked to significant morbidities, including impaired neurodevelopment and growth restriction.
- Small for gestational age (SGA) is often used as a proxy for IUGR but can also include constitutionally small infants, necessitating differentiation for appropriate nutritional management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare body composition and growth velocity in infants with IUGR, SGA, and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at term-equivalent age.
- To determine the impact of being constitutionally small (SGA) versus growth-restricted (IUGR) on infant body composition.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 300 infants (2017-2022) born preterm (<37 weeks gestation).
- Body composition (fat-free mass [FFM] and fat mass [FM]) and weight growth velocity were measured at term-equivalent age.
- Comparison of infants with IUGR (n=40) and SGA (n=11) against AGA controls (n=249).
Main Results:
- IUGR infants exhibited significantly lower FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) compared to AGA infants.
- No significant differences in FFM or weight growth velocity were observed between SGA and AGA infants.
- FFM Z-scores were significantly lower in IUGR infants (p = 0.017) compared to AGA, while SGA infants showed no impact on growth or body composition.
Conclusions:
- Infants born with IUGR demonstrate distinct differences in FFM and growth compared to constitutionally small SGA infants.
- Early and aggressive nutritional management is essential for IUGR infants to mitigate impaired growth and preserve FFM.
- Differentiating IUGR from SGA is critical for tailoring nutritional strategies and improving long-term outcomes.
Abstract:
(1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR, but it may represent a healthy constitutionally small infant. Differentiating between IUGR and constitutionally small infants is essential for the nutritional management. (2) Infants born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2017 and 2022, who underwent body composition measurement (FFM: fat-free mass; FM: fat mass) at term-equivalent age, were included in this study. Infants with IUGR and constitutionally small infants (SGA) were compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA). (3) A total of 300 infants (AGA: n = 249; IUGR: n = 40; SGA: n = 11) were analyzed. FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) were significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants, but equal in SGA and AGA infants. FM was not significantly different between all groups. (4) The FFM Z-score was significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants (p = 0.017). Being born constitutionally small compared to AGA had no impact on growth and body composition. These data showed that early aggressive nutritional management is essential in IUGR infants to avoid impaired growth and loss of FFM.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Signs of Puberty
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Teratogenicity

