Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025
Hollow Microneedle-based Sensor for Multiplexed Transdermal Electrochemical Sensing
Published on: June 1, 2012
Simultaneous Assay of CA 72-4, CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 in Biological Samples Using Needle Three-Dimensional
Alexandru-Adrian Bratei1,2,3,4, Raluca-Ioana Stefan-van Staden1,2, Ruxandra-Maria Ilie-Mihai1
1Laboratory of Electrochemistry and PATLAB, National Institute of Research for Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, 202 Splaiul Independentei Str., 060021 Bucharest, Romania.
Abstract:
Two-needle 3D stochastic microsensors based on boron- and nitrogen-decorated gra-phenes, modified with N-(2-mercapto-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-yl), were designed and used for the molecular recognition and quantification of CA 72-4, CA 19-9, CEA and CA 125 biomarkers in biological samples such as whole blood, urine, saliva and tumoral tissue. The NBGr-2 sensor yielded lower limits of determination. For CEA, the LOD was 4.10 × 10-15 s-1 g-1 mL, while for CA72-4, the LOD was 4.00 × 10-11 s-1 U-1 mL. When the NBGr-1 sensor was employed, the best results were obtained for CA12-5 and CA19-9, with values of LODs of 8.37 × 10-14 s-1 U-1 mL and 2.09 × 10-13 s-1 U-1 mL, respectively. High sensitivities were obtained when both sensors were employed. Broad linear concentration ranges favored their determination from very low to higher concentrations in biological samples, ranging from 8.37 × 10-14 to 8.37 × 103 s-1 U-1 mL for CA12-5 when using the NBGr-1 sensor, and from 4.10 × 10-15 to 2.00 × 10-7 s-1 g-1 mL for CEA when using the NBGr-2 sensor. Student's t-test showed that there was no significant difference between the results obtained utilizing the two microsensors for the screening tests, at a 99% confidence level, with the results obtained being lower than the tabulated values.
