Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025
Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Concurrent Validity of a Low-Cost Manometer for Objective Assessments of Respiratory Muscle Strength
James A Curtis1,2, Valentina Mocchetti2, Anaïs Rameau2,3
1Aerodigestive Innovations Research Lab (AIR), Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Objective(S):
This study examined the agreement in maximal expiratory (MEP) and inspiratory (MIP) pressure readings between two digital manometers: (1) the MicroRPM - the gold-standard manometer for respiratory muscle strength testing; and (2) the LDM - a low-cost, commercially available, alternative manometer.
Methods:
Positive (MEP) and negative (MIP) pressures were simultaneously applied to the MicroRPM and LDM using a 3-liter syringe within a controlled laboratory setting. Pressure readings were compared, and agreement was analyzed using Lin's concordance correlation (ρc ). Agreement was interpreted as 'poor' if <0.90, 'moderate' if 0.90 - <0.95, 'substantial' if 0.95 - <0.99, and 'excellent' if ≥0.99. Twenty percent of the pressure trials were repeated by a second researcher to examine test-retest reliability.
Results:
A total of 150 trials were completed, ranging from -167 to +208 cmH2 O. There was a median absolute difference of 0.3 cmH2 O in pressure readings between the MicroRPM and the LDM. Lin's concordance correlation revealed 'excellent' agreement between the LDM and MicroRPM devices, with test-retest reliability assessment revealing 'substantial-to-excellent' agreement between the LDM and MicroRPM devices, with a concordance correlation coefficient of ρc = 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999-0.999).
Conclusions:
There was a median difference of 1.0% in MEP and MIP pressure readings consistently observed between the LDM and MicroRPM. Despite these relatively small differences, excellent agreement between the two manometers was present. These data suggest the LDM may be a valid, lower cost alternative to the MicroRPM for objectively assessing respiratory strength in clinical practice; however, additional research is needed in healthy adults and in patient populations.
Level Of Evidence:
NA Laryngoscope, 134:1831-1836, 2024.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:27Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
01:19Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...