The Role of Circadian Rhythms in Stroke: A Narrative Review

Stroke, a debilitating condition often leading to long-term disability, poses a substantial global concern and formidable challenge. The increasing incidence of stroke has drawn the attention of medical researchers and neurologists worldwide. Circadian rhythms have emerged as pivotal factors influencing stroke's onset, pathogenesis, treatment, and outcomes. To gain deeper insights into stroke, it is imperative to explore the intricate connection between circadian rhythms and stroke, spanning from molecular mechanisms to pathophysiological processes. Despite existing studies linking circadian rhythm to stroke onset, there remains a paucity of comprehensive reviews exploring its role in pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis. This review undertakes a narrative analysis of studies investigating the relationship between circadian variation and stroke onset. It delves into the roles of various physiological factors, including blood pressure, coagulation profiles, blood cells, catecholamines, cortisol, and the timing of antihypertensive medication, which contribute to variations in circadian-related stroke risk. At a molecular level, the review elucidates the involvement of melatonin, circadian genes, and glial cells in the pathophysiology. Furthermore, it provides insights into the diverse factors influencing stroke treatment and outcomes within the context of circadian variation. The review underscores the importance of considering circadian rhythms when determining the timing of stroke interventions, emphasizing the necessity for personalized stroke management strategies that incorporate circadian rhythms. It offers valuable insights into potential molecular targets and highlights areas that require further exploration to enhance our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. In comparison to the published literature, this manuscript distinguishes itself through its coverage of circadian rhythms' impact on stroke across the entire clinical spectrum. It presents a unique synthesis of epidemiological, clinical, molecular, and cellular evidence, underscoring their collective significance.