Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

09:26
Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone
Published on: January 2, 2020
18.3K
Smartphone Augmented Reality Outperforms Conventional CT Guidance for Composite Ablation Margins in Phantom Models
Katerina H Lee1, Ming Li2, Nicole Varble3
1McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas; Center for Interventional Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : JVIR
|October 18, 2023
Summary
This study developed a smartphone augmented reality (AR) system for liver tumor ablation. The AR system improved ablation accuracy compared to CT guidance, especially for less experienced physicians.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Surgical Technology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Large liver tumors present challenges for accurate ablation.
- Conventional guidance methods like CT may have limitations in precision and real-time feedback.
- Iterative planning is crucial for effective ablation of large tumors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a smartphone augmented reality (AR) system for guiding the ablation of large liver tumors (50 mm).
- To assess the system's effectiveness in treatment planning for composite overlapping ablation zones.
- To compare AR guidance with conventional CT guidance for liver tumor ablation.
Main Methods:
- Developed a smartphone AR application displaying tumor, probe, paths, and ablated volume.
- Used fiducial markers for tracking in phantom studies.
- Four interventional radiologists performed probe insertions using AR and CT guidance.
- Compared ablation percentages and analyzed correlation with experience levels.
Main Results:
- AR guidance resulted in a significantly higher mean percentage of tumor ablated (47% ± 4) compared to CT guidance (36% ± 7).
- Displaying recorded ablation zones during AR guidance further improved the mean composite percentage of tumor ablated (50% ± 2).
- AR guidance showed less correlation with physician experience (r < 0.5) than CT guidance (r > 0.9).
Conclusions:
- Smartphone AR guidance is accurate and effective for large liver tumor ablation.
- The AR system outperforms conventional CT guidance, particularly for interventional radiologists with less experience.
- The AR system promotes more standardized performance across varying experience levels.

