Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Integrated Behavioral Health Implementation and Training in Primary Care: A Practice-Based Research Network Study
Melissa K Filippi1, Jeanette A Waxmonsky2, Mark D Williams2
1From the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, KS (MKF, ER, CMH); Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (MKF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (JAW); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (MDW); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (CD); University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO (AN). mfilippi@aafp.org).
Introduction:
Integrating behavioral health services into primary care has a strong evidence base, but how primary care training programs incorporate integrated behavioral health (IBH) into care delivery and training has not been well described. The goal of this study was to evaluate factors related to successful IBH implementation in family medicine (FM) residency programs and assess perspectives and attitudes on IBH among program leaders.
Methods:
FM residency programs, all which are required to provide IBH training, were recruited from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. After completing eligibility screening that included the Integrated Practice Assessment Tool (IPAT) questionnaire, 14 training programs were included. Selected practices identified 3 staff in key roles to be interviewed: medical director or similar, behavioral health professional (BHP), and chief medical officer or similar.
Results:
Forty-one individuals from 14 FM training programs were interviewed. IPAT scores ranged from 4 (Close Collaboration Onsite) to 6 (Full Collaboration). Screening, outcome tracking, and treatment differed among and within practices. Use of curricula and trainee experience also varied with little standardization. Most participants described similar approaches to communication and collaboration between primary care clinicians and BHPs and believed that IBH should be standard practice. Participants reported space, staff, and billing support as critical for sustainability.
Conclusions:
Delivery and training experiences in IBH varied widely despite recognition of the value and benefits to patients and care delivery processes. Standardizing resources and training and simplifying and assuring reimbursement for services may promote sustainable and high quality IBH implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Integrated Healthcare System
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

