Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Visualization of the Charcoal Agar Resazurin Assay for Semi-quantitative, Medium-throughput Enumeration of Mycobacteria
Published on: December 14, 2016
In vitro susceptibility patterns for slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria in the USA from 2018 to 2022
Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura1, Minh-Vu H Nguyen1, Joshua J Hunkins2
1Division of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Background:
Treatment of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (SGM) is challenging. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is needed to optimize a multidrug regimen but requires weeks to result. Aggregated AST patterns, or an antibiogram, of SGM would be helpful to providers.
Objectives:
We aggregated and analysed human SGM isolates sent to our laboratory from across the USA between 2018 and 2022 to describe their in vitro susceptibility patterns and construct an antibiogram.
Methods:
SGM isolates' species/subspecies and mutations in rrs or rrl were identified by a line probe assay. AST was done primarily by broth microdilution and interpreted using the latest CLSI guideline. Mutational and AST results for SGM with ≥15 isolates were collated and analysed with descriptive statistics.
Results:
There were 32 different species/subspecies of SGM from 10 131 isolates between January 2018 and December 2022 from across the USA, 80% of which were from organisms in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Most specimens were sputum and came from Florida (2892). MAC ranged from 94% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 64% to 91% to amikacin, 2% to 31% to linezolid, and 4% to 41% to moxifloxacin. Non-MAC SGM ranged from 82% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 49% to 100% to amikacin, and 76% to 100% to rifabutin, but susceptibilities to other antimicrobials varied widely. WT rrs and rrl predicted >96% of phenotypic non-resistance to amikacin and clarithromycin, respectively, whereas mutant genotypes predicted >90% of phenotypic resistance.
Conclusions:
Most SGM are likely to be susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin, complementing their treatment guidance by mycobacterial experts. Molecular identification of resistant genotypes is accurate and helpful. This antibiogram for SGM will help providers.
More Related Videos
09:57System for Efficacy and Cytotoxicity Screening of Inhibitors Targeting Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: April 5, 2017
12:39Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex for First and Second Line Drugs by Broth Dilution in a Microtiter Plate Format
Published on: June 24, 2011