Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025
Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
Published on: March 3, 2023
Dynamic Stimulation Aberrometry: Objectively Measured Accommodation and Pupil Dynamics after Phakic Iris-Fixated
Maximilian Hammer1,2, Yvonne Heggemann1,2, Gerd U Auffarth1,2
1David J. Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Purpose:
Anterior iris-claw phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation is a treatment option for refractive, ametropic patients. However, the postoperative accommodative ability has not been systematically researched. Dynamic stimulation aberrometry allows the objective and dynamical measurement of accommodation by observing ocular aberrations during the accommodation process. We investigated the dynamic accommodative ability after pIOL implantation compared with a healthy age- and gender-matched control group.
Design:
Clinical, comparative case-control study.
Subjects:
We included patients aged 18-50 years that either underwent pIOL implantation > 1 month ago or served as a healthy, phakic control group.
Methods:
The accommodative ability and pupil dynamics of both groups were investigated using dynamic stimulation aberrometry. The method allows the analysis of dynamic parameters during accommodation, such as the accommodation speed. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted based on the patients' age and gender.
Main Outcome Measures:
Parameters of objective accommodation, such as accommodative amplitude and pupil dynamic during accommodation.
Results:
Fifty-eight healthy, phakic eyes < 50 years of age and 21 eyes after pIOL implantation to correct myopia (pIOL, Verisyse, AMO, Inc) were enrolled. Patients that underwent anterior pIOL implantation were examined on average 24 ± 18 months after surgery. After matching, the mean age of both groups was not significantly different (35 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 8 years). No significant difference in dynamic parameters of accommodation or the accommodative amplitude (2.8 ± 1.4 and 2.9 ± 1.4 diopters [D] for pIOL and control group, P = 0.82) were seen. Maximum and minimum pupil sizes were not significantly different. The change in pupil size during deaccommodation was significantly faster in patients after pIOL implantation (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Dynamic stimulation aberrometry allowed the objective, dynamic, measurement of wavefronts in subjects with accommodative amplitudes up to 7 D. Phakic intraocular lens implantation does not impair the accommodative ability. It alters pupil dynamics during deaccommodation.
Financial Disclosures:
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
