Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
Published on: January 14, 2014
The effect of cartilage dehydration and rehydration on quantitative ultrashort echo time biomarkers
Lidi Wan1,2, Adam C Searleman2, Yajun Ma2
1Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
The effect of dehydration of ex vivo cartilage samples and rehydration with native synovial fluid or normal saline on quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) biomarkers are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effect of cartilage dehydration-rehydration on UTE biomarkers and to compare the rehydration capabilities of native synovial fluid and normal saline.
Methods:
A total of 37 cartilage samples were harvested from patients (n=5) who underwent total knee replacement. Fresh cartilage samples were exposed to air to dehydrate for 2 hours after baseline magnetic resonance (MR) scanning, then randomly divided into two groups: one soaking in native synovial fluid (n=17) and the other in normal saline (n=20) to rehydrate for 4 hours. UTE-based biomarkers [T1, adiabatic T1r (AdiabT1r), macromolecular fraction (MMF), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and T2*] and sample weights were evaluated for fresh, dehydrated, and rehydrated cartilage samples. Differences and agreements between groups were assessed using the values of fresh cartilage samples as reference standard.
Results:
Dehydrating in air for 2 hours resulted in significant weight loss (P=0.000). T1, AdiabT1r, and T2* decreased significantly while MMF and MTR increased significantly (all P<0.02). Non-significant differences were observed in cartilage weights after rehydrating in both synovial fluid and normal saline, with P values being 0.204 and 0.769, respectively. There were no significant differences in T1, AdiabT1r, MMF, and MTR after rehydrating in synovial fluid (P>0.0167, with Bonferroni correction) while T2* (P=0.001) still had significant differences compared with fresh samples. However, no significant differences were detected for any of the evaluated UTE biomarkers after rehydrating in normal saline (all P>0.05). No differences were detected in the agreement of UTE biomarker measurements between fresh samples and samples rehydrated with synovial fluid and normal saline.
Conclusions:
Cartilage dehydration resulted in significant changes in UTE biomarkers. Rehydrating with synovial fluid or normal saline had non-significant effect on all the evaluated UTE biomarkers except T2* values, which still had significant differences compared with fresh samples after rehydrating with synovial fluid. No significant difference was observed in the rehydration capabilities of native synovial fluid and normal saline.
More Related Videos
07:57An Experimental and Finite Element Protocol to Investigate the Transport of Neutral and Charged Solutes across Articular Cartilage
Published on: April 23, 2017
06:16A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
Published on: May 1, 2020