Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Cognitivism

Cognitivism

Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Switching between cognitive control states? No, thank you.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

In search of precue benefits: Are people unmotivated to heighten control on demand?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same author

Item-specific control of word reading as evidenced by a novel proportion wordness effect.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same author

The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Sequence effects during speech perception reveal multi-accent processing costs.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

Strategic monitoring in prospective memory: Use of contextual cues or a bias to monitor more in words?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Revealing object-based cognitive control in a moving object paradigm.

Jackson S Colvett¹, Blaire J Weidler², Julie M Bugg¹

¹Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St Louis.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|October 23, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People can flexibly adjust cognitive control based on learned object associations, not just location. This object-based cognitive control helps minimize distraction by anticipating conflict likelihood.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Attention Studies

Background:

Cognitive control flexibly adjusts based on contextual cues signaling distraction likelihood.
Prior research has not conclusively demonstrated object-based cognitive control, where individuals adjust control based on learned associations between objects and distraction likelihood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate and demonstrate object-based cognitive control.
To determine if individuals can learn associations between task-irrelevant objects and the likelihood of distraction.

Main Methods:

Developed a novel paradigm with two simultaneously presented objects, each predicting different flanker stimulus incongruence likelihoods.
Objects rotated after each trial to decouple location from incongruence likelihood.
Measured flanker compatibility effects to assess cognitive control adjustments.

Main Results:

Object-based cognitive control was evidenced by reduced flanker compatibility effects for the high-conflict object compared to the low-conflict object.
This effect was dependent on strong manipulation of conflict likelihood and object movement between trials.

Conclusions:

Provides novel evidence for object-based cognitive control, demonstrating that individuals use objects, not just locations, to guide attentional control.
Findings align with object- and location-based attention research, highlighting sophisticated attentional mechanisms.