Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

1.8K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
1.8K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.0K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.0K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

990
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
990
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting01:13

¹H NMR: Complex Splitting

1.3K
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
1.3K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II03:35

Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

32.3K
sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization
32.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncertainty Quantification for <i>In Silico</i> Chemistry.

Chemical reviews·2026
Same author

Benchmarking of vibrational exciton models against quantum-chemical localized-mode calculations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

The Amsterdam Modeling Suite.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

The density-based many-body expansion for poly-peptides and proteins.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2025
Same author

Protein-Ligand Interaction Energies from Quantum-Chemical Fragmentation Methods: Upgrading the MFCC-Scheme with Many-Body Contributions.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2024
Same author

Biocatalytic Ether Lipid Synthesis by an Archaeal Glycerolprenylase.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2024
Same journal

Data-Derived Conceptual DFT Nucleophilicity Index.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Interconversion Mechanisms in H<sub>2</sub>N-O-NH<sub>2</sub>: Rotamerism, Pyramidal Inversion, or Akamptisomerism?

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Machine Learning of Nanoparticle Stability through Topological Layer Embeddings.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Magic Cluster Anion LaCu<sub>12</sub><sup>-</sup>: From Superatomic Electronic Structure to Spherical Aromaticity.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

High-Accuracy Extrapolated Ab Initio Thermochemistry of C<sub>3</sub>O, HC<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>, C<sub>3</sub>S, and HC<sub>3</sub>S<sup></sup>.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Hydrogen Adsorption on Transition-Metal-Decorated Graphene: Thermodynamic and AIMD Insights from DFT and Post-Hartree-Fock Methods.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.2K

Coupled-Cluster Density-Based Many-Body Expansion.

Kevin Focke1, Christoph R Jacob1

  • 1Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Gaußstraße 17, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A
|October 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new density-based many-body expansion method significantly reduces the computational cost of high-accuracy coupled-cluster calculations. This approach achieves chemical accuracy for water clusters, making complex molecular simulations more feasible.

More Related Videos

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

9.0K
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.2K
Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters
10:37

Spatial Separation of Molecular Conformers and Clusters

Published on: January 9, 2014

9.0K
Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
08:04

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids

Published on: May 27, 2020

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Molecular Modeling

Background:

  • Coupled-cluster with singles and doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) is the gold standard for accurate molecular electronic structure calculations.
  • The N^7 computational scaling of CCSD(T) severely limits its application to large molecular systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and assess a resource-efficient method for performing accurate CCSD(T) calculations on large molecular systems.
  • To evaluate the performance of a density-based many-body expansion in conjunction with CCSD(T).

Main Methods:

  • Application of a density-based many-body expansion method combined with CCSD(T).
  • Assessment of accuracy for neutral, protonated, and deprotonated water hexamers, and (H2O)16 and (H2O)17 clusters.
  • Comparison with conventional energy-based many-body expansions and investigation of density approximation effects (Hartree-Fock vs. coupled-cluster densities).

Main Results:

  • A density-based two-body expansion achieved CCSD(T) energies within chemical accuracy (4 kJ/mol) for neutral water clusters.
  • This accuracy surpassed that of conventional energy-based three-body expansions.
  • The accuracy was maintained even when using Hartree-Fock densities instead of coupled-cluster densities.

Conclusions:

  • The density-based many-body expansion offers a computationally efficient and parallelizable alternative for achieving CCSD(T)-quality results.
  • This method significantly expands the feasibility of high-accuracy electronic structure calculations for large and complex molecular systems.