Ethical Considerations for Engaging Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in Research in African Countries: A

Emma Gillette1, Winstone Nyandiko2,3, Ashley Chory1

  • 1Department of Global Health and Health Systems Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Insights

Engaging children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) in research requires careful ethical consideration. This systematic review identified seven key ethical domains to guide responsible research practices with CALWH.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Bioethics
  • Pediatric HIV Research

Background:

  • Engaging children and adolescents living with HIV (CALWH) in research is crucial for developing youth-friendly health services and improving HIV care.
  • Ethical considerations are paramount when involving CALWH in research to protect their rights and well-being.
  • Existing research on ethical engagement of CALWH needs systematic review to identify best practices.

Approach:

  • A systematic review was conducted to identify key ethical considerations for engaging CALWH in research.
  • The review focused on primary research articles from African countries examining ethical issues related to CALWH participation in studies.
  • Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, forming the basis for the ethical domain extraction.

Key Points:

  • Seven key ethical domains were identified: justifications for engagement, community involvement, informed consent/assent, caregiver involvement, perceived benefits, perceived risks, and confidentiality.
  • Justifications for involving CALWH must be clearly established.
  • Informed consent/assent processes need to be age-appropriate and understandable.
  • Community and caregiver involvement are essential for ethical research conduct.
  • Understanding CALWH's perceptions of benefits and risks is vital.
  • Maintaining confidentiality is a critical ethical imperative.

Conclusions:

  • The identified ethical domains provide a framework for the responsible engagement of CALWH in research.
  • Implementing these ethical considerations can enhance the quality and integrity of research involving young people living with HIV.
  • This framework supports the development of ethical guidelines for pediatric HIV research globally.

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
930
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
133
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
314
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
236