Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Content Validation of an Emergency Department Skin Risk Assessment Instrument
Kathleen Flarity1, Wendy J Haylett, Melissa Childers
1UCHealth, University of Colorado, Aurora (Drs Flarity and Haylett and Ms Childers); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for COMBAT Research, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (Dr Flarity).
Abstract:
Pressure injuries (PIs) are an important quality and patient safety metric for health care organizations. PI monitoring and treatment are often overlooked in the emergency department (ED). Emergency care professionals must be proactive about PI early identification and prevention strategies. A team at a Level 1 trauma center recognized the need for ED-friendly documentation and a validated ED skin risk assessment instrument. The Bjorklund 25-item ED Skin/Risk Assessment Tool was selected. However, because the tool was not fully validated, permission to validate/use was obtained from the author. The purpose of this research study was to determine the content validity of the Bjorklund Tool. Using a prospective survey design, content experts were recruited from wound, quality, and ED and participated in two rounds of content validation. The experts reviewed the Tool for relevance, clarity, and appropriateness for the ED population. Item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-level CVI (S-CVI) were calculated, with 0.78 and 0.90 as the lower limits of acceptability for individual items and the overall scale, respectively. Of the first round I-CVI ratings, 24 of 75 were below 0.78, including 14 for relevance, four for clarity, and six for appropriateness. S-CVI was 0.7574 for relevance, 0.8809 for clarity, 0.8592 for appropriateness, and 0.8325 overall. The Bjorklund Tool was determined to be invalid in its current form. A novel tool was thus created in the second round per content experts' recommendations. After redesign and simplifying items and images, all I-CVIs rated above 0.78. S-CVI was 0.923 for relevance, 0.9743 for clarity, 0.9615 for appropriateness, and 0.9529 overall. These CVIs indicate excellent content validity of the new UCHealth ED Skin Risk Assessment Instrument. This research contributes to establishment of content validity of a skin risk assessment instrument which can be used in the unique ED setting.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...

