Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
Published on: September 22, 2023
[Start of enteral nutrition after an endoscopic gastrostomy, is it necessary to wait?]
William Otero-Regino1, Hernando Marulanda-Fernández2, Gilberto Jaramillo-Trujillo3
1Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá D.C., Colombia; Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá D.C., Colombia; Gastroenterólogo, Centro de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia. Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Insights
Starting enteral nutrition 4 hours after a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is safe. Early nutrition initiation showed no increased risk of intolerance, complications, or death compared to the standard 12-hour interval.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Nutrition
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Enteral nutrition (EN) initiation post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) typically occurs 12-24 hours after the procedure.
- Emerging evidence suggests that earlier EN initiation may be safe and beneficial.
- Optimizing the timing of EN initiation post-PEG is crucial for patient recovery and resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of initiating EN 4 hours post-PEG compared to the standard 12-hour interval.
- To assess differences in nutritional intolerance, postoperative complications, and mortality between early and standard EN initiation groups.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing EN timing after PEG placement.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, multicenter study conducted in Bogotá and Cundinamarca from June 2020 to May 2022.
- 117 patients undergoing PEG were randomized into two groups: early EN initiation (4 hours) and standard EN initiation (12 hours).
- Data collected included causes of dysphagia (cerebrovascular disease, COVID-19 complications), nutritional intolerance, postoperative complications, and mortality.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of nutritional intolerance between the early (4-hour) and standard (12-hour) EN initiation groups (RR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.30-2.90).
- Postoperative complications (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.09-1.16) and mortality (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.59-2.15) did not differ significantly between the two groups.
- Cerebrovascular disease (43%) and COVID-19 complications (26%) were the primary indications for PEG and dysphagia.
Conclusions:
- Early initiation of EN 4 hours after PEG placement is a safe practice.
- This early feeding approach does not lead to increased nutritional intolerance, complications, or mortality compared to the traditional 12-hour interval.
- The findings support revising current guidelines to consider earlier EN initiation post-PEG.
Abstract:
Traditionally, the initiation of enteral nutrition after a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is performed between 12 and 24 hours. Different research suggests that early initiation might be a safe option. Our aim was to determine whether starting enteral nutrition 4 hours after performing PEG is a safe practice in terms of risk of intolerance, complications, or death, compared to starting it at 12 hours. We carried out a prospective, randomized, multicenter study in third and fourth level institutions in Bogotá and Cundinamarca, between June 2020 and May 2022, 117 patients were included who were randomized into 2 groups, group A with early nutrition initiation (4 hours), and standard group B (12 hours). The most frequent mechanism of dysphagia was cerebrovascular disease (43%), followed by complications of COVID19 infection (26%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups evaluated regarding the percentage of intolerance to nutrition, RR = 0.93 (CI 0.30-2.90), there were also no differences in terms of postoperative complications, (RR) = 0.34 (CI 0.09-1.16), and no differences were found in mortality between the evaluated groups, (RR) = 1.12 (CI 0.59-2.15). In conclusion, early initiation of nutrition through the gastrostomy, 4 hours after performing the PEG, is a safe behavior that is not related to greater intolerance to nutrition, complications, or death, compared to later initiation.
More Related Videos
03:32Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
Published on: December 27, 2024
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease