Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Information gathering explains decision dynamics during human and monkey reward foraging.
Humans and monkeys overharvest resources, staying too long in depleting patches. A new model explains this foraging behavior by integrating current and declining reward information.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral economics
- Animal behavior
- Cognitive neuroscience
Background:
- Optimal foraging theories predict efficient resource exploitation.
- Deviations, such as overharvesting, are common in animal and human foraging.
- Understanding the computational basis of these deviations is crucial.
Approach:
- Modeled human foraging behavior in a virtual patch-leaving task.
- Validated findings in monkeys performing an analogous foraging task.
- Developed a computational model integrating current and declining reward information.
Key Points:
- Both humans and monkeys exhibited overharvesting, staying longer in patches with longer travel times.
- Patch residence times decreased over sessions, improving reward rates in humans.
- A logistic transformation model accurately predicted foraging decisions.
Conclusions:
- A parsimonious model explains overharvesting by incorporating information about declining rewards.
- This highlights the role of information gathering in overcoming foraging dilemmas.
- Behavioral modeling reveals motivations behind seemingly irrational foraging decisions.
More Related Videos
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Instinctive Drift
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...