Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A click-crosslinked dopamine-functionalized hydrogel for therapeutic delivery of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles.

Biomaterials science·2026
Same author

Engineering Complexity: Advances in 3D Breast Cancer Models for Precision Oncology.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025
Same author

3D Bioprinted Renal Constructs Using Kidney-Specific ECM Bioink System on Kidney Regeneration.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025
Same author

Challenges and perspectives in using finite element modeling to advance 3D bioprinting.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2025
Same author

Combinatorial strategy for engineering cartilage and bone microtissues using microfluidic cell-laden microgels.

Biofabrication·2025
Same author

3D Bioprinting for Engineered Tissue Constructs and Patient-Specific Models: Current Progress and Prospects in Clinical Applications.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.5K

Enhancing Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction with Clinically Applicable 3D Bioprinted Constructs.

Hyeongjin Lee1, Carlos Kengla1,2, Han Su Kim1,3

  • 1Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.

Advanced Healthcare Materials
|October 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biomimetic bone scaffolds, designed using medical imaging and 3D bioprinting, significantly enhanced bone regeneration by minimizing fibrotic tissue formation. This patient-specific approach shows clinical relevance for bone defect repair.

Keywords:
bioprintingboneosteoconductivityregenerationscaffoldtissue engineering

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.4K
Novel Process for 3D Printing Decellularized Matrices
08:14

Novel Process for 3D Printing Decellularized Matrices

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.4K
Novel Process for 3D Printing Decellularized Matrices
08:14

Novel Process for 3D Printing Decellularized Matrices

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Patient-specific bone scaffolds can be fabricated using medical imaging and 3D bioprinting.
  • Designing scaffolds with controlled architectures is crucial for effective bone regeneration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effectiveness of a biomimetic scaffold design with geometric control for enhanced bone regeneration.
  • To compare the bone regeneration capacity of biomimetic scaffolds against control scaffolds.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized medical imaging to capture patient-specific anatomy.
  • Employed 3D bioprinting to fabricate biomimetic scaffolds with a dense external layer.
  • Evaluated bone regeneration through histological examination and assessment of new bone formation.

Main Results:

  • Biomimetic scaffolds demonstrated superior bone regeneration compared to control scaffolds.
  • New bone formation completely filled defects in biomimetic scaffolds, unlike control scaffolds.
  • Histological analysis revealed effective bone regeneration and minimal fibrotic tissue ingrowth in biomimetic scaffolds.

Conclusions:

  • A biomimetic scaffold design, optimized to reduce fibrotic tissue competition, significantly enhances bone regeneration.
  • Medical imaging and 3D bioprinting enable accurate translation of patient anatomy into clinically relevant bone constructs.