Bi-steric mTORC1 inhibitors induce apoptotic cell death in tumor models with hyperactivated mTORC1
Heng Du1, Yu Chi Yang2, Heng-Jia Liu1
1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is commonly dysregulated in cancer. Rapalogs exhibit modest clinical benefit, likely owing to their lack of effects on 4EBP1. We hypothesized that bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors would have greater potential for clinical benefit than rapalogs in tumors with mTORC1 dysfunction. We assessed this hypothesis in tumor models with high mTORC1 activity both in vitro and in vivo. Bi-steric inhibitors had strong growth inhibition, eliminated phosphorylated 4EBP1, and induced more apoptosis than rapamycin or MLN0128. Multiomics analysis showed extensive effects of the bi-steric inhibitors in comparison with rapamycin. De novo purine synthesis was selectively inhibited by bi-sterics through reduction in JUN and its downstream target PRPS1 and appeared to be the cause of apoptosis. Hence, bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors are a therapeutic strategy to treat tumors driven by mTORC1 hyperactivation.
Insights
Bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors show promise for treating cancers with mTORC1 hyperactivation. These novel inhibitors effectively reduce tumor growth and induce apoptosis, outperforming existing rapalogs by targeting 4EBP1.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway is frequently dysregulated in various cancers.
- Rapalogs offer limited clinical benefits, potentially due to their insufficient inhibition of 4EBP1, a key downstream target of mTORC1.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the therapeutic potential of bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors compared to rapalogs in preclinical cancer models.
- To determine if bi-steric inhibitors offer superior efficacy in tumors characterized by mTORC1 hyperactivity.
Main Methods:
- In vitro and in vivo assessment of bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors in tumor models with elevated mTORC1 activity.
- Comparative analysis of bi-steric inhibitors, rapamycin, and MLN0128 regarding tumor growth inhibition, 4EBP1 phosphorylation, and apoptosis induction.
- Multiomics analysis to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of bi-steric inhibitor action.
Main Results:
- Bi-steric inhibitors demonstrated potent tumor growth inhibition and induced significant apoptosis, exceeding the effects of rapamycin and MLN0128.
- Bi-steric inhibitors effectively eliminated phosphorylated 4EBP1, unlike rapalogs.
- Multiomics analysis revealed extensive molecular alterations induced by bi-steric inhibitors, including the selective inhibition of de novo purine synthesis via reduction of JUN and PRPS1.
Conclusions:
- Bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic strategy for cancers driven by mTORC1 hyperactivation.
- Targeting mTORC1 with bi-steric inhibitors, which effectively inhibit 4EBP1 and de novo purine synthesis, offers a potential advantage over current rapalog therapies.
More Related Videos
06:00Development of a Human Preclinical Model of Osteoclastogenesis from Peripheral Blood Monocytes Co-cultured with Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Published on: September 13, 2017
19:44Enhancement of Apoptotic and Autophagic Induction by a Novel Synthetic C-1 Analogue of 7-deoxypancratistatin in Human Breast Adenocarcinoma and Neuroblastoma Cells with Tamoxifen
Published on: May 30, 2012
Related Concept Videos
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
