Tracking a moving visual target in the rhesus monkey: influence of the occurrence frequency of the target path

Following previous studies documenting the ability to generate anticipatory responses, we tested whether the repeated motion of a visual target along the same path affected its oculomotor tracking. In six rhesus monkeys, we evaluated how the frequency of a target path influenced the onset, accuracy, and velocity of eye movements. Three hundred milliseconds after its extinction, a central target reappeared and immediately moved toward the periphery in four possible (oblique) directions and at a constant speed (20°/s or 40°/s). During each daily session, the frequency of one motion direction was either uncertain (25% of trials) or certain (100% of trials). Our results show no reduction of saccade latency between the two sessions. No express saccades were observed in either session. A slow eye movement started after target onset (presaccadic glissade) and its velocity was larger during the "certain" sessions only with the 40°/s target. No anticipatory eye movement was observed. Longer intersaccadic intervals were found during the "certain" sessions but the postsaccadic pursuit velocity exhibited no change. No correlation was found between the accuracy and precision of saccades (interceptive or catch-up) and the postsaccadic pursuit velocity. Repeatedly tracking a target that moves always along the same path does not favor the generation of anticipatory eye movements, saccadic or slow. Their occurrence is not spontaneous but seems to require preliminary training. Finally, for both sessions, the lack of correlation between the saccade-related and pursuit-related kinematic parameters is consistent with separate control of saccadic and slow eye movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Following previous studies documenting anticipatory movements, we investigated how the frequency of occurrence of a target path influenced the generation of tracking eye movements. When present, the effects were small. The limited performance that we found suggests that anticipatory responses require preliminary training, in which case, they should not be considered as a behavioral marker of the primates' ability to extrapolate but the outcome of learning and remembering past experience.