Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Diagnosis
P Leyendecker1, F-R Roustan2, P Meria3
1Service de radiologie B, nouvel hôpital Civil, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, groupe d'imagerie médicale MIM, AFR-SIGU, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract:
The choice of imaging modality is guided by the clinical presentation and the context (acute or not). Although ultrasound is safe (no radiation) and easily available, non-contrast-enhanced CT has become the gold standard in the diagnostic strategy for patients with acute flank pain because of its sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (96.6%). It also allows determining the stone size, volume and density, visualizing their internal structure, and assessing their distance from the skin and the adjacent anatomy. All these parameters can influence the stone management and the choice of intervention modality. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendations method (CPR) and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the issue was considered in the EAU recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi IV: Nutrition Therapy and Prevention
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

