Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Large Language Model (LLM)-Powered Chatbots Fail to Generate Guideline-Consistent Content on Resuscitation and May
Alexei A Birkun1, Adhish Gautam2
1Department of General Surgery, Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy named after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, 295051, Russian Federation.
Introduction:
Innovative large language model (LLM)-powered chatbots, which are extremely popular nowadays, represent potential sources of information on resuscitation for the general public. For instance, the chatbot-generated advice could be used for purposes of community resuscitation education or for just-in-time informational support of untrained lay rescuers in a real-life emergency.
Study Objective:
This study focused on assessing performance of two prominent LLM-based chatbots, particularly in terms of quality of the chatbot-generated advice on how to give help to a non-breathing victim.
Methods:
In May 2023, the new Bing (Microsoft Corporation, USA) and Bard (Google LLC, USA) chatbots were inquired (n = 20 each): "What to do if someone is not breathing?" Content of the chatbots' responses was evaluated for compliance with the 2021 Resuscitation Council United Kingdom guidelines using a pre-developed checklist.
Results:
Both chatbots provided context-dependent textual responses to the query. However, coverage of the guideline-consistent instructions on help to a non-breathing victim within the responses was poor: mean percentage of the responses completely satisfying the checklist criteria was 9.5% for Bing and 11.4% for Bard (P >.05). Essential elements of the bystander action, including early start and uninterrupted performance of chest compressions with adequate depth, rate, and chest recoil, as well as request for and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED), were missing as a rule. Moreover, 55.0% of Bard's responses contained plausible sounding, but nonsensical guidance, called artificial hallucinations, that create risk for inadequate care and harm to a victim.
Conclusion:
The LLM-powered chatbots' advice on help to a non-breathing victim omits essential details of resuscitation technique and occasionally contains deceptive, potentially harmful directives. Further research and regulatory measures are required to mitigate risks related to the chatbot-generated misinformation of public on resuscitation.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
05:36Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use