How do search systems impact systematic searching? A qualitative study

Area of Science:

• Information Science
• Health Sciences
• Research Methodology

Background:

• Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis rely on robust systematic search methods.
• Existing search systems frequently lack essential attributes for effective systematic searching.
• Limitations in search systems can impede the thoroughness and efficiency of evidence retrieval.

Purpose of the Study:

• To examine the effects of search system limitations on systematic searching processes.
• To understand how information professionals select sources for evidence synthesis projects.
• To identify user needs and market dynamics influencing search system design for systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

• A qualitative study was conducted using thematic analysis.
• Data were collected through interviews with twelve systematic searchers.
• Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to interpret the qualitative data.

Main Results:

• Search systems significantly shape systematic search processes and information source selection.
• Many systems, especially for unpublished studies, are not optimized for systematic searching.
• Economic factors influence source selection and vendor prioritization of systematic searchers.

Conclusions:

• Search system vendors need to recognize systematic searchers as a distinct user group with unique needs.
• Improvements in interface design and functionality are crucial for more efficient evidence synthesis.
• Addressing system limitations and market barriers can enhance the quality and efficiency of systematic reviews.