Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Outcomes and use of healthcare resources after an intervention for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia
Athanasios Saratzis1, Liam Musto1, Santosh Kumar2
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Insights
For chronic limb-threatening ischemia, revascularization has similar healthcare costs and appointments compared to primary amputation. Patients undergoing amputation experienced higher cardiovascular events and mortality within one year.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Health Economics
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) poses a significant challenge, with unclear outcomes for patients undergoing revascularization versus primary amputation.
- Assessing postoperative results and healthcare resource utilization is crucial for informed clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 1-year postoperative outcomes and healthcare costs between revascularization and primary amputation for CLTI.
- To analyze healthcare resource use across primary, community, and secondary care settings.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the UK Kent Integrated Dataset, linking 1.6 million patient records across care settings.
- Identified patients with new CLTI diagnoses undergoing revascularization or major amputation between January 2016 and January 2019.
- Analyzed postoperative events and healthcare resource use for 1 year post-procedure.
Main Results:
- Of 579 patients who underwent intervention, 296 had angioplasty, 75 bypass surgery, and 141 a primary amputation.
- Readmissions were similar across procedures; bypass surgery led to more appointments (median 4 vs 2).
- Primary amputation was linked to higher cardiovascular events and 1-year mortality, with no significant cost differences between procedures.
Conclusions:
- Revascularization for CLTI is not associated with increased healthcare appointments or costs compared to primary amputation over 1 year.
- Patients undergoing primary amputation face higher risks of cardiovascular events and mortality.
Background:
The fate of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia undergoing revascularization or a primary amputation is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the postoperative outcomes and post-procedural healthcare resource use/costs over 1 year after revascularization or a primary amputation for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.
Methods:
The UK Kent Integrated Dataset, which links primary, community, and secondary care for 1.6 million people, was interrogated. All patients with a new diagnosis of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia undergoing revascularization or a major amputation between January 2016 and January 2019 (3 years) were identified. Postoperative events across all healthcare settings and post-procedure healthcare resource use were analysed over 1 year (until the end of 2019).
Results:
Overall, 4252 patients with a new diagnosis of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia were identified (65 per cent were male and the mean age was 73 years) between January 2016 and January 2019, of whom 579 (14 per cent) underwent an intervention (studied population); 296 (7 per cent) had an angioplasty, 75 (2 per cent) had bypass surgery, 141 (3 per cent) had a primary major lower limb amputation, 11 had a thrombo-embolectomy (0.3 per cent), and 56 had an endarterectomy (1.3 per cent). Readmissions (median of 2) were similar amongst different procedures within 1 year; bypass surgery was associated with more hospital appointments (median of 4 versus 2; P = 0.002). Patients undergoing a primary amputation had the highest number of cardiovascular events and 1-year mortality. In a linear regression model, index procedure type and Charlson co-morbidity index score were not predictors of appointments in primary/secondary care, community care visits, or readmissions after discharge. There were no statistically significant differences regarding post-procedural healthcare costs between procedures over 1 year.
Conclusion:
Revascularization is not associated with more hospital, primary/community care appointments or increased post-procedural healthcare costs over 1 year when compared with primary amputation, in people with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

