Patient response to variations in denture technique. Part III: Five-year subjective evaluation

Dentures were constructed for 64 patients by two different techniques. One technique, designated as "complex," involved more complicated procedures such as a true hinge axis location, balanced occlusion, dentures remounted on an articulator after processing with new interocclusal records, and occlusal corrections made on the articulator. The "standard" technique involved an arbitrary mounting of the maxillary cast on the articulator, arranging the occlusion with centric relation coincident with centric occlusion but without a balanced occlusion, and making occlusal corrections in the mouth. Subjective evaluations were made for each of the 64 patients at initial placement of the dentures and for all active patients at five yearly recall visits following placement. The evaluation method was designed to determine clinical differences between the dentures made by the two techniques. At the end of 5 years, the data obtained at five yearly recall visits were subjected to statistical testing. These tests were performed to determine if the technique by which the dentures were made had any effect on the performance of the dentures that could be detected clinically. The results of the test showed that there was no significant difference between dentures made using two denture techniques that could be detected by subjective means.