Effect of vault on predicting postoperative refractive error for posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens based on a
Yinjie Jiang1, Yang Shen, Lin Wang
1From the Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (Jiang, Shen, X. Chen, Tang, Liu, Zhou, X. Wang); National Health Commission Key Lab of Myopia, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (Jiang, Shen, X. Chen, Tang, Liu, Zhou, X. Wang); Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China (Jiang, Shen, X. Chen, Tang, Liu, Zhou, X. Wang); Beijing Airdoc Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China (L. Wang, Ma, Ju, Y. Chen, Ge); Monash Medical AI Group, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (L. Wang, Ju, Ge).
Purpose:
To investigate how vault and other biometric variations affect postoperative refractive error of implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) by integrating artificial intelligence and modified vergence formula.
Setting:
Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Design:
Artificial intelligence and big data-based prediction model.
Methods:
2845 eyes that underwent uneventful spherical ICL or toric ICL implantation and with manifest refraction results 1 month postoperatively were included. 1 eye of each patient was randomly included. Random forest was used to calculate the postoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent by inputting variable ocular parameters. The influence of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula on predicting postoperative refractive error was analyzed. Subgroup analysis of ideal vault (0.25 to 0.75 mm) and extreme vault (<0.25 mm or >0.75 mm) was performed.
Results:
In the test set of both ICLs, all the random forest-based models significantly improved the accuracy of predicting postoperative sphere compared with the Online Calculation & Ordering System calculator ( P < .001). For ideal vault, the combination of modified Holladay formula in spherical ICL exhibited highest accuracy ( R = 0.606). For extreme vault, the combination of predicted vault in spherical ICL enhanced R values ( R = 0.864). The combination of predicted vault and modified Holladay formula was most optimal for toric ICL in all ranges of vault (ideal vault: R = 0.516, extreme vault: R = 0.334).
Conclusions:
The random forest-based calculator, considering vault and variable ocular parameters, illustrated superiority over the existing calculator on the study datasets. Choosing an appropriate lens size to control the vault within the ideal range was helpful to avoid refractive surprises.
More Related Videos
05:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024