Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

57
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
57
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

34.4K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.4K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

8.4K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
8.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

703
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
703
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.3K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous learning of static and dynamic charges.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Journal research data policies in materials science.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

How to Train a Shallow Ensemble.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Li-P-S Electrolyte Materials as a Benchmark for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A universal machine learning model for the electronic density of states.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

Medium-Range Structural Order in Amorphous Arsenic.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

241

Robustness of Local Predictions in Atomistic Machine Learning Models.

Sanggyu Chong1, Federico Grasselli1, Chiheb Ben Mahmoud1

  • 1Laboratory of Computational Science and Modeling, Institute of Materials, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|November 10, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a metric, local prediction rigidity (LPR), to evaluate the robustness of machine learning models used in chemistry and materials science. Enhancing LPR improves model reliability and interpretability.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

241
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Materials science
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Machine learning models for molecules and materials often decompose global properties into local, atom-centered contributions for computational efficiency and interpretability.
  • While practical, the rigorous definition and robustness of these local contributions are not guaranteed.
  • Sensitivity to training strategies and model architecture necessitates careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a quantitative metric, local prediction rigidity (LPR), for assessing the robustness of locally decomposed predictions in machine learning models.
  • To investigate how training data composition influences LPR.
  • To develop strategies for enhancing LPR to improve model performance.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of the local prediction rigidity (LPR) metric.
  • Systematic investigation of LPR's dependence on training data set composition.
  • Testing across various problems, from toy models to real chemical systems.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the utility of LPR in quantifying the robustness of atom-centered contributions in machine learning models.
  • Identified key aspects of model training, particularly data set composition, that affect LPR.
  • Showcased strategies to systematically improve LPR.

Conclusions:

  • Local prediction rigidity (LPR) provides a crucial measure for the reliability of atomistic machine learning models.
  • Strategies to enhance LPR can significantly improve the robustness, interpretability, and transferability of these models.
  • This work offers a pathway to more trustworthy and interpretable machine learning in chemistry and materials science.