Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Continuous Charge Distributions01:17

Continuous Charge Distributions

Imagine a bucket of water. It contains many molecules, of the order of 1026 molecules. Thus, although it contains discrete elements (molecules) at the microscopic level, macroscopically, it can be considered continuous. Small volume elements of water, infinitesimal compared to the bulk of the bucket's volume, still contain many molecules. Under this framework, quantized matter is approximated as continuous for practical purposes.
The electric charge can also be subjected to an analogical...
Coulomb's Law and The Principle of Superposition01:15

Coulomb's Law and The Principle of Superposition

Coulomb's Law describes the force experienced by two point charges under each other's presence. But what if there are more than two charges? For example, if there is a third charge, does it experience a force that is a simple combination of the individual forces due to the first two charges? Can it be described mathematically?
The Principle of Superposition answers the question. Yes, Coulomb's Law applies to each pair of charges, and the net force on each charge is the vector sum of the...
Electric Field of Two Equal and Opposite Charges01:30

Electric Field of Two Equal and Opposite Charges

Atoms generally contain the same number of positively and negatively charged particles, protons, and electrons. Hence, they are electrically neutral. However, the centers of the positive and negative charges do not always coincide. In such a scenario, the electric field of an atom may not be zero.
A separation of the positive and negative charges can lead to a weak, remnant effect of the positive and negative charges. The expectation is that the more the distance between the positive and...
Electric Field01:16

Electric Field

Consider two point charges, each exerting Coulomb force on the other. It is possible to describe the Coulomb interaction via an intermediate step by defining a new physical quantity called the electric field.
In the new picture, imagine that the first charge sets up an electric field independent of all other charges in the universe. When another charge comes in its vicinity, the second charge experiences an electric force depending on the electric field at that point. The source charge does not...
Sources and Properties of Electric Charge01:15

Sources and Properties of Electric Charge

All objects we see around us consist of atoms, which combine to form molecules. The lightest element in the universe is hydrogen, and a hydrogen atom consists of a positively charged proton and a negatively charged electron. The magnitude of charge that a proton and an electron carry are the same, and it is the fundamental unit of charge. In SI units, it is 1.602 times 10-19 coulomb.
Most atoms additionally constitute another fundamental particle, the neutron. It carries no electrical charge. A...
Charge on a Conductor01:26

Charge on a Conductor

An interesting property of a conductor in static equilibrium is that extra charges on the conductor end up on its outer surface, regardless of where they originate. Consider a hollow metallic conductor with a uniform surface charge density. Since the conductor itself is in electrostatic equilibrium, there should not be any electric field inside the conductor. Now, assume a Gaussian surface enclosing the hollow portion. Applying Gauss's law, the inner surface of the hollow conductor will not...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temperature-dependent capacitance of the electrical double layer.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

How to Train a Shallow Ensemble.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A universal machine learning model for the electronic density of states.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

Resolving the body-order paradox of machine learning interatomic potentials.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Phase diagram and criticality of the modified primitive electrolyte model in bulk and in inert and conducting confinement.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

metatensor and metatomic: Foundational libraries for interoperable atomistic machine learning.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Active learning-driven global search for neutral gold clusters <i>via</i> neural network potential.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Development of indole-based hydration-sensitive fluorescent nucleoside analogues: experimental and computational studies.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Gradient engineering enabled thermoelectric performance optimization in LaP/LaAs heterostructures.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Barrierless proton and hydrogen atom migrations in photoionized benzaldehyde clusters result in benzyl alcohol formation: an ion-molecule perspective.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Weakly protonated polyethylenimine induces SiC flocculation in alkaline suspensions.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Accurate interdomain contacts in a mixed folded protein from NMR-guided coarse-grained simulations.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

Simultaneous learning of static and dynamic charges.

Philipp Stärk1,2, Henrik Stooß3, Marcel F Langer4

  • 1Stuttgart Center for Simulation Science (SC SimTech), University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|June 18, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Learning static and dynamic charges for atomistic machine learning is challenging. Independent modeling of these charges is more practical and computationally efficient than coupled approaches, even for complex systems like water clusters.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Clamp Methods to Investigate Impaired Neuronal Excitability Associated with Autism
08:44

Dynamic Clamp Methods to Investigate Impaired Neuronal Excitability Associated with Autism

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

Dynamic Clamp Methods to Investigate Impaired Neuronal Excitability Associated with Autism
08:44

Dynamic Clamp Methods to Investigate Impaired Neuronal Excitability Associated with Autism

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Atomistic machine learning
  • Quantum mechanics

Background:

  • Accurate modeling of condensed-phase systems requires capturing long-range interactions and electric response.
  • Static charges (Coulomb interactions) and dynamic charges (atomic polar tensors/Born effective charges) represent these phenomena.
  • Efficiently learning both charge types within a single model is a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically compare different approaches for learning static and dynamic charges simultaneously.
  • To evaluate the impact of coupling strategies and dielectric screening on model accuracy and computational cost.
  • To determine the most practical modeling approach for condensed-phase and cluster systems.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three approaches: independent charge learning, coupled learning with global screening, and coupled learning with environment-dependent screening.
  • Utilizing bulk water and water clusters as test systems.
  • Analyzing accuracy and computational cost for each approach.

Main Results:

  • Coupled learning requires dielectric screening correction, which is complex in heterogeneous systems.
  • Learned, environment-dependent screening improves dynamic charge accuracy but offers negligible gain over independent predictions.
  • Coupled approaches increase computational cost compared to independent models.

Conclusions:

  • Despite theoretical links, independent modeling of static and dynamic charges is the more practical and computationally efficient choice.
  • This holds true for both condensed-phase and isolated cluster systems.
  • Atomistic machine learning models benefit from simpler, independent charge learning strategies.