Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

08:47
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
Published on: February 9, 2024
1.5K
Total and component forest aboveground biomass inversion via LiDAR-derived features and machine learning algorithms
Jiamin Ma1, Wangfei Zhang1, Yongjie Ji2
1College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China.
Frontiers in Plant Science
|November 13, 2023
Summary
Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) effectively estimates forest aboveground biomass (AGB) and its components. The random forest algorithm demonstrated superior accuracy in AGB retrieval compared to support vector regression.
Area of Science:
- Forestry
- Remote Sensing
- Ecology
Background:
- Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is crucial for assessing ecosystem health, productivity, and carbon stocks.
- Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology excels at capturing forest vertical structure and vegetation spatial distribution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate forest total and component AGB using features derived from airborne LiDAR point cloud data.
- To rank and optimize LiDAR-derived features for AGB estimation using partial least squares regression.
Main Methods:
- Extracted 56 features from airborne LiDAR point cloud data.
- Utilized partial least squares regression for feature importance ranking and optimization.
- Employed random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) algorithms for AGB estimation, validated by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and cross-validation.
Main Results:
- Key features for AGB estimation included cumulative height percentiles (AIH), height percentiles (H), and height-related variables (Hmean, Hsqrt, Hmad, Hcurt).
- The RF algorithm achieved the best performance for total AGB estimation (R² = 0.75, RMSE = 22.93 Mg/ha via LOOCV).
- Accuracy for component AGB estimation followed the order: stem > bark > branch > leaf, with RF outperforming SVR.
Conclusions:
- LiDAR-derived features are sensitive indicators for forest total and component AGBs.
- RF algorithm provides more accurate AGB estimations than SVR, with minimal validation differences between LOOCV and cross-validation (<5%).
- Retrieval of leaf component AGB showed lower accuracy compared to other biomass components.

