Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Covariate-adjusted value-guided subgroup identification via boosting
Jinchun Zhang1, Pingye Zhang2, Junshui Ma1
1Merck & Co. MRL, BARDS, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Abstract:
It is widely recognized that treatment effects could differ across subgroups of patients. Subgroup analysis, which assesses such heterogeneity, provides valuable information in developing personalized therapies. There has been extensive research developing novel statistical methods for subgroup identification. The recent contribution is a value-guided subgroup identification method that directly maximizes treatment benefit at the subgroup level for survival outcome, rather than relying on individual treatment effect estimation. In this paper, we first completed this framework by illustrating its application to continuous and binary outcomes. More importantly, we extended the original framework to account for the prognostic effects and named this new method Covariate-Adjusted Value-guided subgroup identification via boosting (CAVboost). The original method directly used the outcome to formulate the value function for subgroup identification. Since the outcome can further be decomposed as prognostic effects and treatment effects, specifying the prognostic effects as the covariates of a model for the outcome can single out the treatment effects and improve the power to detect them across subgroups. Our proposed CAVboost was based on this key idea. It used a covariate-adjusted treatment effect estimator, instead of the outcome itself, to formulate the value function for subgroup identification. CAVboost estimates the treatment effect by using covariates to account for the prognostic effects, which mimics the idea of using covariates in an ANCOVA estimator. We showed that CAVboost could effectively improve the subgroup identification capability for both continuous and binary outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Cancer Survival Analysis

