Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Variability of baroreceptor reflex assessed by tilt table test in a patient undergoing pulmonary vein isolation
Anna Zuk1, Roman Piotrowski2, Agnieszka Sikorska1
1Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Department of Cardiology, Grochowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Background:
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a significant role in atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation (CA) affects the ANS balance. The assessment of baroreceptor (BR) function is an established method to measure parasympathetic activity; however, it has been rarely used in patients undergoing CA of AF.
Aims:
This study is to assess changes in BR function caused by CA and to compare these changes between two different types of CA: point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) versus cryoballoon (CB).
Methods:
In this observational, prospective, single center study, 78 patients (25 females, mean age 58 ± 9) with paroxysmal AF and first CA were included: 39 patients (RF group) and 39 (CB group). The BR function was assessed non-invasively using tilt testing and three parameters: event count (BREC) depicting overall BR activity, slope mean depicting BR sensitivity (BRS), and BR effectiveness index (BEI).
Results:
The groups did not differ in clinical or demographic data. Before CA, tilting caused a marked decrease in BR function parameters in the whole study group (BREC (29 ± 14.0-50.0 vs 28 ± 9.0-44.0, p < 0.068), BRS (10.2 ± 7.1-13.2 vs 5.8 ± 4.9-8.5; p < 0.001), and BEI (52.9 ± 39.9-65.5 vs 39.6 ± 23.6-52.1; p < 0.001), supine vs tilting, respectively). These changes were similar in the both groups. After CA, BR function decreased in the whole group (BREC 12.0 ± 3.0-22.0 vs 6.0 ± 3.0-18.0, p = 0.004; BRS 4.8 ± 3.6-6.8 vs 4.0 ± 3.0-5.8, p = 0.014; BEI 18.7 ± 8.3-27.4 vs 12.0 ± 5.1-21.0, p = 0.009). BREC was significantly more decreased in the CB vs RF. Similar trend was noted for BRS and BEI.
Conclusions:
CA significantly affects BR function. These changes were more pronounced following CB rather than RF CA.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement

