Gray Learning From Non-IID Data With Out-of-Distribution Samples
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
Abstract:
The integrity of training data, even when annotated by experts, is far from guaranteed, especially for non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) datasets comprising both in- and out-of-distribution samples. In an ideal scenario, the majority of samples would be in-distribution, while samples that deviate semantically would be identified as out-of-distribution and excluded during the annotation process. However, experts may erroneously classify these out-of-distribution samples as in-distribution, assigning them labels that are inherently unreliable. This mixture of unreliable labels and varied data types makes the task of learning robust neural networks notably challenging. We observe that both in- and out-of-distribution samples can almost invariably be ruled out from belonging to certain classes, aside from those corresponding to unreliable ground-truth labels. This opens the possibility of utilizing reliable complementary labels that indicate the classes to which a sample does not belong. Guided by this insight, we introduce a novel approach, termed gray learning (GL), which leverages both ground-truth and complementary labels. Crucially, GL adaptively adjusts the loss weights for these two label types based on prediction confidence levels. By grounding our approach in statistical learning theory, we derive bounds for the generalization error, demonstrating that GL achieves tight constraints even in non-IID settings. Extensive experimental evaluations reveal that our method significantly outperforms alternative approaches grounded in robust statistics.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Outliers and Influential Points
Sampling Distribution
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

