Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Innovations in Assist Devices to Improve External Ventricular Drain Placement: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature From 1985 to 2023.

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)·2025
Same author

Risk factors related to traumatic spinal cord injury outcomes: An analysis of the US National Trauma Data Bank.

The journal of spinal cord medicine·2025
Same author

Vascularization, Innervation, and Inflammation: Pathways Connecting the Heart-Brain Axis and Implications in a Clinical Setting.

Biomedicines·2025
Same author

Applications of mixed reality with medical imaging for training and clinical practice.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2024
Same author

The Optimal Prediction Model for Successful External Cephalic Version.

American journal of perinatology·2024
Same author

Tracheopathia osteochondroplastica: a case report illustrating the importance of imaging in this rare disorder.

AME case reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.6K

Prediction Models for Successful External Cephalic Version: An Updated Systematic Review.

Rahul Sai Yerrabelli1,2,3, Claire Lee1,2, Peggy K Palsgaard1,2

  • 1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.

American Journal of Perinatology
|November 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary

The Newman-Peacock model is the only validated tool for predicting external cephalic version (ECV) success. While newer models show promise, they require further validation before clinical use.

More Related Videos

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

19.7K
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
03:43

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: September 13, 2022

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

14.6K
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

19.7K
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
03:43

Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: September 13, 2022

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Clinical Prediction Models

Background:

  • External cephalic version (ECV) is a procedure to turn a breech baby to a head-down position before birth.
  • Predicting the success of ECV is crucial for optimizing patient care and outcomes.
  • Existing decision aids for ECV success prediction require systematic review and evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comprehensive review of available and developing decision aids for predicting external cephalic version (ECV) success.
  • To identify and evaluate prediction models designed for individual ECV success outcomes.
  • To assess the validation status and clinical readiness of identified ECV prediction models.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2015-2022), including a prior review.
  • Selection of English-language articles describing or evaluating prediction models for ECV outcomes (cephalic presentation, vaginal delivery).
  • Independent article selection by two authors following PRISMA 2020 guidelines; assessment of model validation and risk of bias.

Main Results:

  • 25 ECV prediction models were identified, with 14 published in the last 5 years.
  • The Newman-Peacock model is the only model with repeated external validation and readiness for clinical use.
  • Newer models demonstrate more robust design and potential for improved prediction but require further external validation.

Conclusions:

  • The Newman-Peacock model remains the sole prediction tool validated for routine clinical application in ECV.
  • Emerging ECV prediction models show promise due to improved methodologies and larger datasets.
  • Further rigorous external validation is essential for newer models to establish their clinical utility and predictive accuracy.