Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025
MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
Subnodal Correspondence of PSMA Expression and USPIO-MRI in Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer
Melline Gabrielle Maria Schilham1, Diederik M Somford, Andor Veltien
1From the Department of Medical Imaging-Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.G.M.S., A.V., P.Z., J.O.B., M.G., M.R., T.W.J.S.); Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, the Netherlands (D.M.S., J.P.M.S.); Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (D.M.S.); Andros Clinics, Medical Imaging, Arnhem, the Netherlands (J.O.B.); Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.P.M.S.); and Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (H.V.N.K.-V.).
Objectives:
Two advanced imaging modalities used to detect lymph node (LN) metastases in prostate cancer patients are prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As these modalities use different targets, a subnodal comparison is needed to interpret both their correspondence and their differences. The aim of this explorative study was to compare ex vivo 111 In-PSMA μSPECT images with high-resolution 7 T USPIO μMR images and histopathology of resected LN specimens from prostate cancer patients to assess the degree of correspondence at subnodal level.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty primary prostate cancer patients who underwent pelvic LN dissection were included and received USPIO contrast and 111 In-PSMA. A total of 41 LNs of interest (LNOIs) were selected for ex vivo imaging based on γ-probe detection or palpation. μSPECT and μMRI acquisition were performed immediately after resection. Overlay of μSPECT images on MR images was performed, and the level of correspondence (LoC) between μSPECT and μMR findings was assessed according to a 4-point Likert classification scheme.
Results:
Forty-one LNOIs could be matched to an LN on ex vivo μMRI. Coregistration of μSPECT and USPIO-enhanced water-selective multigradient echo MR images was successful for all 41 LNOIs. Ninety percent of the lesions showed excellent correspondence regarding the presence of metastatic tissue and affected subnodal site (LoC 4; 37/41). In only 1 of 41 LNOIs, a small metastasis was misclassified by both techniques. Three LNOIs were classified as LoC 3 (7%) and 1 LNOI as LoC 2. All LoC 2 and LoC 3 lesions had PSMA-expressing metastases on final histopathology.
Conclusions:
Coregistration of μSPECT and USPIO-μMRI showed excellent subnodal correspondence in the majority (90%) of LNs. Ex vivo imaging may thus help localize small cancer deposits within resected LNs and could contribute to improved interpretation of in vivo imaging of LNs.
More Related Videos
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
