Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

10.9K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
10.9K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

43
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
43

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of immersive virtual reality on fear, anxiety, and pain in pregnant women during vaginal examination in clinical training: a randomized controlled trial.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Precocious Puberty.

Galen medical journal·2026
Same author

Genitourinary malignancy among patients presenting with microscopic hematuria in Northwestern Ontario.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same author

The power of machine learning models in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same author

Exploring sexual health challenges in men with type 2 diabetes-related erectile dysfunction: a qualitative study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Evaluation of PRVC and SIMV ventilation techniques on hemodynamic metrics and arterial blood gases in ICU patients with multiple trauma: A randomized, triple-blind study.

Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)·2025
Same journal

The associations between maternal disability and perinatal outcomes among Black and/or Hispanic women in PRAMS.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same journal

Pregnancy and related complications in achondroplasia: a scoping review.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same journal

Evaluating progestin-primed and GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocols in PGT-A cycles: implications for clinical practice.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same journal

Does the number of abnormal values in the oral glucose tolerance test impact pregnancy outcomes?

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same journal

RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in placentas of women with spontaneous abortion: a retrospective pilot study.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same journal

Reproductive carrier screening among Chinese couples experiencing unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.

Amene Ranjbar1, Farideh Montazeri2, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah3

  • 1Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
|November 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict low birth weight (LBW). The extreme gradient boost model showed the best performance, with gestational age and prior LBW history as key predictors.

Keywords:
Birth weightFetal weightLow birth weightMachine learningX gradient boost model

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
09:24

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable

Published on: May 17, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
09:24

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable

Published on: May 17, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Perinatal health
  • Medical informatics
  • Predictive analytics in obstetrics

Background:

  • Low birth weight (LBW) is a significant risk factor for infant mortality and adverse newborn health outcomes.
  • Accurate prediction of LBW is crucial for timely intervention and improved neonatal care.
  • The study addresses the need for effective predictive tools in maternal and neonatal health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting low birth weight (LBW).
  • To compare the diagnostic performance of various statistical learning models in identifying LBW.
  • To identify key predictors of LBW in singleton pregnancies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net) database (January 2020 - January 2022).
  • Included singleton pregnancies >24 weeks gestation; excluded multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies.
  • Evaluated eight machine learning models including deep learning, random forest, and extreme gradient boost, using AUROC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score for performance assessment.

Main Results:

  • A total of 8853 deliveries were analyzed, with a low birth weight (LBW) incidence of 14.5% (1280 cases).
  • Deep learning (AUROC: 0.86), random forest (AUROC: 0.79), and extreme gradient boost (AUROC: 0.79) demonstrated superior performance.
  • The extreme gradient boost model achieved the highest diagnostic performance with an accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.77.

Conclusions:

  • The extreme gradient boost model demonstrated strong predictive capability for low birth weight (LBW).
  • Gestational age and a history of prior LBW were identified as critical predictors.
  • Further research is warranted to definitively establish the optimal machine learning model for LBW prediction.