Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Facilitated Diffusion01:16

Facilitated Diffusion

482
The plasma membrane, a critical structure in cellular biology, houses an array of transporters, or carrier proteins, interspersed within its lipid bilayer. These proteins play a crucial role in solute transport through facilitated diffusion, a form of passive diffusion that uses transporters to move the molecules across the membrane.
In this process, substrates such as organic compounds and ions interact with a transporter on one side, triggering conformational changes in proteins that enable...
482
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

34.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.5K
Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

13.5K
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
13.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The case against efficiency: friction in social media.

Npj complexity·2026
Same author

The development of risk behaviors and their cultural transmission.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Possessing potential weapons (still) heightens anger perception: Replicating and extending a test of error management theory.

PloS one·2025
Same author

User control of search algorithms would improve science.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

How opinion variation among in-groups can skew perceptions of ideological polarization.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Information architectures: a framework for understanding socio-technical systems.

Npj complexity·2025
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Innovation-facilitating networks create inequality.

Cody Moser1, Paul E Smaldino1,2,3

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|November 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Network structure significantly impacts group innovation and individual performance. Enhancing innovation through network factors like size and connectivity often increases performance inequality, creating

Keywords:
collective intelligencecultural evolutioninequalityinnovationnetworks

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Complex Systems
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Innovation Studies

Background:

  • Innovation theories often debate whether individual brilliance or institutional structures drive progress.
  • Existing population models highlight factors like size and connectivity but often overlook individual roles within groups.
  • Understanding how network structures influence both group innovation and individual performance is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of network structures on population-level innovation and individual performance.
  • To examine how network size, connectivity, and information sharing rates affect innovation and performance inequality.
  • To explore the emergence of 'genius effects' within agent-based models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an agent-based model simulating the Potions Task, a paradigm for exploring group problem-solving.
  • Analyzed the impact of varying network size, connectivity, and information sharing rates on innovation.
  • Assessed the relationship between network structure and the distribution of individual contributions and performance.

Main Results:

  • Population size positively correlates with innovation, with many small groups outperforming fewer large ones on a per capita basis.
  • Network structure changes had minimal impact on innovation, but higher centrality correlated with better individual performance.
  • All network factors that boosted innovation also proportionally increased performance inequality, leading to 'genius effects'.

Conclusions:

  • Network structure plays a critical role in shaping both group innovation and the distribution of individual success.
  • Improvements in network-driven innovation are intrinsically linked to increased performance disparities among individuals.
  • Findings have implications for understanding innovation dynamics in both idealized and real-world networks.