Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Synthesis and Characterization of an Aspirin-fumarate Prodrug that Inhibits NFκB Activity and Breast Cancer Stem Cells
Published on: January 18, 2017
A Phase I/II Study of GSK525762 Combined with Fulvestrant in Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive/HER2-negative
David W Cescon1, John Hilton2, Serafin Morales Murilo3
1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Purpose:
Endocrine-based therapy is the initial primary treatment option for hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, patients eventually experience disease progression due to resistance to endocrine therapy. Molibresib (GSK525762) is a small-molecule inhibitor of bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) family proteins (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT). Preclinical data suggested that the combination of molibresib with endocrine therapy might overcome endocrine resistance. This study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy [objective response rate (ORR)] of molibresib combined with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- mBC.
Patients And Methods:
In this phase I/II dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, patients received oral molibresib 60 or 80 mg once daily in combination with intramuscular fulvestrant. Patients enrolled had relapsed/refractory, advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer with disease progression on prior treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor.
Results:
The study included 123 patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) were nausea (52%), dysgeusia (49%), and fatigue (45%). At a 60-mg dosage of molibresib, >90% of patients experienced treatment-related AE. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AE were observed in 47% and 48% of patients treated with molibresib 60 mg and molibresib 80 mg, respectively. The ORR was 13% [95% confidence interval (CI), 8-20], not meeting the 25% threshold for proceeding to phase II. Among 82 patients with detected circulating tumor DNA and clinical outcome at study enrollment, a strong association was observed between the detection of copy-number amplification and poor progression-free survival (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.73-4.83; P < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Molibresib in combination with fulvestrant did not demonstrate clinically meaningful activity in this study.
Insights
This study investigated molibresib combined with fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer but found no significant clinical activity. The combination therapy did not meet efficacy endpoints, indicating limited benefit for patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Endocrine therapy is standard for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
- Disease progression due to endocrine resistance is a significant challenge.
- Molibresib, a BET inhibitor, showed potential to overcome endocrine resistance in preclinical studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of molibresib plus fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- mBC.
- To determine the objective response rate (ORR) of this combination therapy.
Main Methods:
- Phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study.
- 123 patients with advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer received oral molibresib (60 or 80 mg) with intramuscular fulvestrant.
- Patients had disease progression on prior endocrine therapy.
Main Results:
- Common adverse events included nausea, dysgeusia, and fatigue.
- Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 47-48% of patients.
- The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 13%, below the 25% threshold for phase II progression.
- Copy-number amplification in ctDNA was associated with poor progression-free survival.
Conclusions:
- Molibresib in combination with fulvestrant did not demonstrate clinically meaningful activity.
- The combination did not meet the predefined efficacy endpoint for further development.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
05:29A Rapid Screening Workflow to Identify Potential Combination Therapy for GBM using Patient-Derived Glioma Stem Cells
Published on: March 28, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview