Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

04:44
Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
Published on: July 21, 2021
4.2K
Exploring the neural basis and modulating factors of implicit altercentric spatial perspective-taking with fNIRS
Natania Ang1,2, Birgit Brucker3, David Rosenbaum4
1LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Walter-Simon-Straße 12, 72072, Tübingen, Germany. natania-shuyi.ang@uni-tuebingen.de.
Scientific Reports
|November 23, 2023
Summary
Humans do not spontaneously use embodied strategies for spatial perspective-taking (SPT), even with action cues. Instead, inconsistent choices suggest deliberate, effortful cognitive control network (CCN) engagement during SPT.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Cognition
Background:
- Humans naturally adopt others' perspectives for spatial information, particularly with observed actions.
- Two main theories, embodied (hMNS) and disembodied (CCN), explain the neural basis of spatial perspective-taking (SPT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if action observation influences implicit spatial perspective-taking (SPT).
- To determine if cortical activation patterns predict transformation strategies in altercentric SPT.
- To test the involvement of the human mirror neuron system (hMNS) versus the cognitive control network (CCN) in SPT.
Main Methods:
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity.
- A spatial judgment task was adapted to assess implicit altercentric and egocentric SPT.
- 117 participants were analyzed, with exploratory analyses on inconsistent subgroups (22 subjects).
Main Results:
- Inconsistent altercentric SPT showed greater activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and left motor cortex (MC).
- No evidence supported spontaneous embodied strategies during implicit altercentric SPT, even with grasping cues.
- Neural patterns in inconsistent subgroups suggest the cognitive control network (CCN) drives deliberate, effortful disembodied strategies.
Conclusions:
- Implicit spatial perspective-taking (SPT) appears to rely more on cognitive control network (CCN) engagement than embodied processes.
- Inconsistent performance in SPT tasks may indicate a shift towards effortful, disembodied strategies.
- Future research should explore the interplay between decision-making consistency and neural mechanisms in SPT.

