Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
[Obstetric violence as epistemic injustice: childbirth trouble.]
1Doctora en Filosofía y Antropología. Profesora titular de Filosofía Moral, Departamento de Filosofía I, Universidad de Granada, Granada, España.
Abstract:
This article theoretically frames the issue of obstetric violence as epistemic injustice, drawing heavily from feminist phenomenological philosophy, within the general framework of narrative bioethics and the fight for sexual-reproductive rights. The first section deals with the concept of obstetric violence, emphasizing Latin America's pioneering role in its coinage and recognition, as well as its empirical-hermeneutical applications. In the second section, consideration is given to how the concept of obstetric violence has been analyzed through the lens of epistemic injustice (in its two versions: testimonial and hermeneutic), which has signified major progress in its systemic understanding and its biopolitical nature. The article's conclusions highlight the full empirical-theoretical relevance of the term, as a thick philosophical concept, despite existing tensions between the biosanitary (especially medical) sector and citizen demands.
Related Concept Videos
Torts II
Obedience
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

