Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2025

06:11
Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
9.8K
Patient Priorities Concerning Treatment Decisions for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors Identified by Discrete Choice
Matthew Anaka1,2, David Chan3, Sharon Pattison4
1Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
The Oncologist
|November 25, 2023
Summary
Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients show varied preferences for treatments. While many prioritize longer progression-free survival (PFS), a significant portion values lower adverse event (AE) rates or less invasive options, underscoring shared decision-making importance.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Economics
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) present diverse treatment choices.
- Discrepancies exist between physician and patient priorities regarding treatment attributes like adverse event (AE) rates.
- Understanding patient preferences is crucial for patient-centered decision-making in NET management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elicit treatment preferences of patients with advanced midgut and pancreatic NET (pNET).
- To determine relative utility rankings for treatment attributes including progression-free survival (PFS), treatment modality, and AE rates.
- To identify patient priorities for specific NET treatment profiles.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) employing the potentially all pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives (PAPRIKA) method.
- Elicited preferences from 110 midgut NET and 132 pNET patients.
- Attribute levels were derived from randomized clinical trial data for NET treatments.
Main Results:
- Longer PFS was the primary preference for the majority of participants (64.5% midgut, 59% pNET).
- Approximately 40% of participants prioritized lower AE rates or less invasive modalities over PFS.
- In midgut NETs, 60.9% favored peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and 30.0% favored somatostatin analogue dose escalation.
Conclusions:
- Neuroendocrine tumor patients exhibit heterogeneous treatment priorities.
- Patient preferences vary regarding progression-free survival, adverse events, and treatment invasiveness.
- Shared decision-making is essential for optimizing treatment choices in NET patients.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
984
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
984
Ethical Issues
973
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
973
Cancer Survival Analysis
356
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
356
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
4.9K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.9K

