Assessment of Halogen Off-Center Point-Charge Models Using Explicit Solvent Simulations
Andreia Fortuna1,2,3, Paulo J Costa1,2
1BioISI─Instituto de Biosistemas e Ciências Integrativas, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1749-016, Portugal.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|November 27, 2023
Summary
Off-center point-charge (EP) models improve halogen bond (XB) predictions in molecular dynamics, but their impact on hydration free energies (ΔGhyd) is nuanced. Some EP models slightly enhance ΔGhyd prediction, mainly by improving hydrogen bond sampling, not direct XB interactions.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Molecular modeling
- Biophysics
Background:
- Halogen bonds (XBs) are crucial interactions between halogenated compounds and biological targets.
- Off-center point-charge (EP) models are used in molecular mechanics and dynamics to describe halogen anisotropy.
- Experimental validation of EP models using hydration free energies (ΔGhyd) is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of three EP models in predicting hydration free energies (ΔGhyd).
- To evaluate the impact of EP models on the accuracy of force field predictions for halogenated compounds.
- To understand the relationship between EP model implementation and the prediction of halogen bonding and hydration properties.
Main Methods:
- Alchemical free energy calculations were employed to predict ΔGhyd values.
- Three different off-center point-charge (EP) models were tested.
- The predictive accuracy of EP models was compared against models without explicit charge centers.
Main Results:
- EP models showed a slight improvement in ΔGhyd prediction compared to non-EP models, particularly for chlorinated compounds.
- The observed improvement was primarily attributed to enhanced sampling of hydrogen bonds, not direct halogen bond interactions.
- The choice of EP model significantly impacted results, especially for iodinated molecules, with mixed outcomes depending on σ-hole strength.
Conclusions:
- EP models offer a marginal benefit for ΔGhyd prediction, mainly through improved hydrogen bond sampling.
- The effectiveness of EP models is compound-specific and depends on the halogen type and electronic properties (e.g., σ-hole).
- Careful selection of EP models is essential for accurate molecular simulations involving halogenated compounds.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Formal Charges
32.6K
In some cases, there are seemingly more than one valid Lewis structures for molecules and polyatomic ions. The concept of formal charges can be used to help predict the most appropriate Lewis structure when more than one reasonable structure exists.
32.6K
Molecular Shape and Polarity
60.5K
Dipole Moment of a Molecule
60.5K
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
13.0K
The VSEPR theory can be used to determine the electron pair geometries and molecular structures as follows:
13.0K
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
42.4K
Effect of Lone Pairs of Electrons on Molecule Geometry
42.4K
Bond Polarity, Dipole Moment, and Percent Ionic Character
28.9K
Bond Polarity
28.9K
Molecular Models
38.5K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
38.5K


