Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare

Collin W Blackburn1, Jerry Y Du2, Randall E Marcus1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Insights

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) costs vary significantly by indication, with conversion arthroplasty being 40% more expensive than osteoarthritis. Current Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) codes do not capture these cost differences, impacting hospital reimbursement.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Health Economics
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Hospital payments for inpatient procedures, including primary total joint arthroplasties (hip and knee), are determined by Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) codes.
  • Current MS-DRG codes (469 and 470) do not differentiate costs based on the specific indication for total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially leading to inadequate reimbursement.
  • Understanding cost variations across different THA indications is crucial for accurate financial management and policy development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify cost differences for primary THA across six common indications: osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, hip dysplasia, posttraumatic arthritis, and conversion arthroplasty.
  • To identify the primary drivers of cost variation among these THA indications.
  • To analyze variations in length of stay, discharge destination, and intensive care unit (ICU) use associated with different THA indications.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) Limited Data Set, identifying 135,194 elective primary THAs.
  • Estimated hospital costs using cost-to-charge ratios and analyzed hospital charges from 30 revenue centers.
  • Employed multivariable generalized linear models for cost analysis and multivariable binomial logistic regression for length of stay, ICU use, and discharge destination, controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.

Main Results:

  • THA for conversion arthroplasty was 40% more costly than for osteoarthritis, followed by posttraumatic arthritis (22% increase), hip dysplasia (13% increase), and avascular necrosis (5% increase).
  • Medical/surgical supplies and operating room charges were the primary cost drivers across all indications.
  • Increased odds of prolonged length of stay, non-home discharge, and ICU use were observed for most non-osteoarthritis indications, particularly posttraumatic arthritis and conversion arthroplasty.

Conclusions:

  • Primary THA indications beyond osteoarthritis are associated with significantly increased resource use and stepwise cost escalations.
  • Current MS-DRG coding inadequately reflects the complexity and resource demands of various THA indications, potentially causing financial losses for hospitals.
  • Hospitals with high volumes of complex THA cases should anticipate higher costs, and improved MS-DRG systems are needed for appropriate reimbursement.
Abstract