Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

108
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
108
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

32
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
32
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

3.3K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.3K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

One academic health center's response to a freedom of expression controversy.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Response to: 'A flourishing-centered curriculum can only thrive through the embrace of diversity'.

Medical teacher·2025
Same author

Could Changing the Language From Social "Determinants" to Social "Dynamics" of Health Encourage Transformational Change?

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2025
Same author

Advancing flourishing as the north star of medical education: A call for personal and professional development as key to becoming physicians.

Medical teacher·2024
Same author

Addressing Well-being Throughout the Health Care Workforce: The Next Imperative.

JAMA·2022
Same author

In Reply to Marshall.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2022
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Naming learner agency at the bedside: FPTAL (from passive reception to active learning) as a dialogic bridge.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Fostering conversation and co-regulation: how medical students experience co-creating narrative feedback.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Understanding accelerated 3-year MD program graduates: key considerations for residency directors.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Building the foundation of clinical training: a mixed-methods study of pre-clerkship clinical preceptors and retention.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Upward trend of publications with student and trainee authors appearing in Academic Medicine, 2016-2025.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

232

We Need to Talk: Advancing Open Inquiry.

Christine K Cassel, Cheryl A Maurana

    Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
    |November 27, 2023
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Societal divisiveness impacts medical schools, affecting free speech and marginalized groups. Constructive dialogue models can bridge divides, fostering open inquiry essential for medical education and patient care.

    More Related Videos

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
    10:26

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    4.0K
    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
    14:43

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: January 12, 2018

    11.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    232
    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
    10:26

    Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

    Published on: September 11, 2021

    4.0K
    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
    14:43

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: January 12, 2018

    11.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Sociology
    • Communication Studies

    Background:

    • U.S. society faces increasing divisiveness, challenging higher education's support for free speech and marginalized groups.
    • "Cancel culture" creates fear and misunderstanding, impacting professional environments.
    • Medical education is particularly sensitive due to complex issues like racial justice, reproductive health, and gender identity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the impact of societal divisiveness on medical schools.
    • To identify strategies for fostering open inquiry and constructive dialogue in medical education.
    • To equip future physicians with skills to navigate sociopolitical divides in clinical practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current societal dynamics and their effects on academic institutions.
    • Exploration of challenges in balancing free speech with respect for marginalized groups.
    • Identification and description of models promoting constructive dialogue and empathy.

    Main Results:

    • Divisiveness creates fear and hinders open expression in medical settings.
    • Existing organizations offer models for constructive dialogue and empathy-building.
    • These methods can equip medical students to manage polarized discussions.

    Conclusions:

    • Bridging sociopolitical divides requires respectful communication and open inquiry.
    • Medical education must cultivate skills for civil discourse to enhance patient care.
    • Ongoing effort and practice are crucial for the healthcare enterprise to thrive amidst societal challenges.