Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
An optimization framework to guide the choice of thresholds for risk-based cancer screening
Adam R Brentnall1, Emma C Atakpa2, Harry Hill3
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. a.brentnall@qmul.ac.uk.
This study introduces a new framework for selecting risk groups using artificial intelligence (AI) models to optimize breast cancer screening intervals. The AI model aims to reduce advanced cancer diagnoses by tailoring screening frequency based on individual risk.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Risk stratification for cancer screening often overlooks model performance alongside intervention availability.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) models offer potential for improved cancer risk assessment but require careful integration into screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a framework for selecting risk groups by considering both AI model performance and available interventions.
- To guide breast cancer screening intervals using an AI model to minimize advanced cancer incidence.
Main Methods:
- Developed a framework using linear programming to define risk groups that minimize expected advanced cancer incidence under resource constraints.
- Applied the framework to breast cancer screening intervals using an AI model, with performance estimated from a case-control study and other parameters from screening trials.
Main Results:
- The AI model recommended tailored screening intervals: 1 year for the highest 4% risk, 3 years for the middle 64%, and 4 years for the lowest 32%.
- This approach was expected to reduce advanced cancer diagnoses by approximately 18 per 1000, maintaining similar average screening frequency.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated robustness of threshold choices to model parameters, though advanced cancer reduction estimates require further validation.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework effectively defines risk thresholds for risk-adapted screening, aiming to reduce the population health burden of cancer.
- Further evaluation through health-economic modeling and real-world studies is recommended to validate the framework's impact on advanced cancer reduction.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Kaplan-Meier Approach

