Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
990
Genetic depletion does not prevent rapid evolution in island-introduced lizards
Stéphanie Sherpa1, Josephine R Paris2, Iolanda Silva-Rocha3,4
1Dipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali Università degli Studi di Milano Milano Italy.
Ecology and Evolution
|November 30, 2023
Summary
Experimental introductions can drive rapid lizard adaptation. Genomic analysis reveals few genetic changes despite significant diet shifts, suggesting major roles for plasticity and strong selection at specific genes.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Genomics
- Ecology
Background:
- Experimental introductions offer insights into rapid phenotypic change.
- Few studies examine genetic impacts of introductions, including neutral and adaptive processes.
- Wall lizards on Croatian islands provide a model for studying adaptation after introduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genetic basis of rapid phenotypic changes in experimentally introduced wall lizards.
- To differentiate between neutral genetic drift, plasticity, and natural selection in adaptation.
- To understand the evolutionary potential of bottlenecked populations under new selective pressures.
Main Methods:
- Genomic analysis using approximately 82,000 ddRAD loci.
- Comparison of genetic differentiation between introduced and source populations.
- Genome-scan analysis to identify loci under selection.
- Functional annotation of candidate genes.
Main Results:
- Confirmed founder effect and low neutral genetic differentiation between introduced and source populations.
- Observed signals of population expansion and high density despite genetic depletion.
- Identified a small number of loci with significant allelic shifts between ecologically divergent populations.
- Found candidate genes related to diet-induced adaptation.
Conclusions:
- Extreme phenotypic differences are likely driven by a few large-effect genetic loci and/or phenotypic plasticity.
- Bottlenecked populations possess evolutionary potential to adapt rapidly to new environments.
- Directional selection may play a role in diet-induced adaptation, as suggested by candidate genes.
Related Concept Videos
Speciation Rates
21.2K
Overview
21.2K
Types of Selection
40.5K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.5K
Genetic Drift
39.8K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
39.8K
The Evidence for Evolution
42.8K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
42.8K
Gene Flow
35.1K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
35.1K
Conservation of Small Populations
13.1K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
13.1K

