Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012
Influence of transducer pressure and examiner experience on muscle active shear modulus measured by shear wave
R Pimenta1, F Coelho2, J P Correia2
1CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada Dafundo, Portugal; Research Center of the Polytechnic Institute of Maia (N2i), Maia Polytechnic Institute (IPMAIA), Castêlo da Maia, 4475-690 Maia, Portugal; Futebol Clube Famalicão - Futebol SAD, Department of Rehabilitation and Performance, Famalicão, Portugal.
Introduction:
This study examined the effects of ultrasound transducer pressure and examiner experience on the biceps femoris long head and semitendinosus muscle active shear modulus in healthy individuals (n = 28).
Methods:
Active shear modulus was assessed using shear wave elastography at 20% of knee flexor maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Examiners with different experience levels measured the muscles' shear modulus with three pressure levels: mild, moderate, and hard.
Results:
A main effect of transducer pressure was found for both biceps femoris long head (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.314) and semitendinosus muscles (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.280), whereas differences were found between mild-moderate (biceps femoris long head: p = 0.013, d = 0.23; semitendinosus: p = 0.024, d = 0.25), and mild-hard pressures (biceps femoris long head: p = 0.001, d = 0.47; semitendinosus: p = 0.002, d = 0.47). Examiners performed similar shear modulus measurements in the biceps femoris long head (p = 0.299; η2p = 0.041) and semitendinosus (p = 0.177; η2p = 0.066), although the experienced examiner showed a higher measurement repeatability (biceps femoris long head: ICC = 0.86-0.95, semitendinosus: ICC = 0.89-0.96; vs. biceps femoris long head: ICC = 0.78-0.87, semitendinosus: ICC = 0.66-0.87).
Conclusion:
Transducer pressure influences the active shear modulus measurement between mild and moderate or hard pressures. Additionally, examiner experience seems to have no influence on muscle active shear modulus measurement when assessed at the same site (using casts).
Implications For Practice:
Future studies assessing active muscle shear modulus should use mild transducer pressure and having experienced examiners in order to improve measurement reliability.
Related Concept Videos
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
Shearing Strain
Strain and Elastic Modulus
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

