Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

100
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
100

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human versus AI in audiological practice: A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT and physician treatment decisions in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

PloS one·2026
Same author

fNIRS estimates prefrontal cortex activation following glucose load in youths with obesity.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2026
Same author

Sensorimotor numerosity uniquely supports arithmetic development in children.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

Prevalence, seasonal patterns, and microbial co-occurrence of selected genital tract microorganisms in women attending a gynecological counseling service in Southern Italy.

BMC infectious diseases·2026
Same author

The Audiological Aspect of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Genes·2026
Same author

Does the magnitude of numbers cause lateral shifts of spatial attention (also taking into account directional counting habits and the speed of reaction times)?

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Top-down determinants of the numerosity-time interaction.

Irene Petrizzo1, Michele Pellegrino2, Giovanni Anobile1

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology, and Child Health, University of Florence, 50139, Florence, Italy.

Scientific Reports
|November 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Visual stimuli with more items (numerosity) are perceived as longer lasting. This effect depends on how participants judge duration, suggesting top-down cognitive processes influence magnitude perception.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

735
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

735
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Previous research indicates larger visual stimuli are perceived as having longer durations.
  • This duration-size illusion diminishes with qualitative (same/different) judgments compared to quantitative (longer/shorter) judgments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between visual numerosity and perceived duration.
  • To determine if the numerosity-duration effect is modulated by response type and task demands.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged the duration of dot clouds varying in numerosity.
  • Response types included quantitative (longer/shorter) and qualitative (same/different) judgments, as well as a time motor reproduction task.
  • Task difficulty and sensory precision were controlled and compared across experiments.

Main Results:

  • Larger numerosities were judged as longer lasting in quantitative tasks (Experiments 1 & 4).
  • No significant numerosity-duration effect was observed in qualitative tasks (Experiment 2) or the motor reproduction task (Experiment 3).
  • The observed interference was not attributable to differences in task difficulty or sensory precision.

Conclusions:

  • The functional interaction between numerosity and time perception is not primarily driven by shared bottom-up magnitude coding mechanisms.
  • High-level, top-down cognitive processes, particularly those involved in decision-making and response selection, play a critical role in mediating numerosity-time interference.
  • The use of magnitude-related response codes significantly influences cross-domain magnitude interactions.